Can you teach a hands-on skill online? A scoping review of e-learning for point-of-care ultrasound in medical education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75272Abstract
Background: There is an increasing need and interest in teaching point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) online. The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding e-learning as a method for teaching POCUS in medical education, to assess the benefits and limitations of various styles of e-learning for POCUS, and to identify gaps in the literature that could help guide future research in this field.
Methods: A literature search was conducted on three databases including MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials on October 12, 2021, retrieving a total of 1630 studies. 31 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies were separated into different styles of e-learning and learner outcomes were analyzed based on Kirkpatrick’s hierarchy.
Results: The studies were categorized into 3 styles of e-learning: a) blended learning b) online-only (asynchronous or synchronous) and c) use of handheld machines or telesonography. POCUS knowledge and image interpretation were successfully taught online, however online-only learning for image acquisition was not as consistently effective. Blended learning and telesonography were beneficial for learning image acquisition skills. Generally, novice learners benefited most from e-learning.
Conclusion: E-learning for POCUS is gaining in popularity in recent years. POCUS is a complex technical skill, and depending on the individual task being taught, different styles of e-learning may be more successful. These findings can inform future POCUS educational programs.
References
Melniker LA, Leibner E, McKenney MG, Lopez P, Briggs WM, Mancuso CA. Randomized controlled clinical trial of point-of-care, limited ultrasonography for trauma in the emergency department: the first sonography outcomes assessment program trial. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:227-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.008.
Stone BS, Muruganandan KM, Tonelli MM, Dugas JN, Verriet IE, Pare JR. Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on treatment time for ectopic pregnancy. Am J Emerg Med 2021;49:226-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.071.
Harel-Sterling M, Diallo M, Santhirakumaran S, Maxim T, Tessaro M. Emergency department resource use in pediatric pneumonia: point-of-care lung ultrasonography versus chest radiography. J Ultrasound Med 2019;38:407-14 https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14703.
Claiborne MK, Ng C, Breslin KA, Chamberlain J, Thomas-Mohtat R. The effect of point-of-care ultrasound on length of stay in the emergency department in children with neck swelling. Am J Emerg Med 2021;48:295-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.05.009.
Mercaldi CJ, Lanes SF. Ultrasound guidance decreases complications and improves the cost of care among patients undergoing thoracentesis and paracentesis. Chest 2013;143:532-8 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-0447.
Wilson SP, Assaf S, Lahham S, et al. Simplified point-of-care ultrasound protocol to confirm central venous catheter placement: a prospective study. World J Emerg Med 2017;8:25-8 https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.01.004.
Lichtenstein DA, Mezière GA. Relevance of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute respiratory failure: the BLUE protocol. Chest 2008;134:117-25 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-2800.
Atkinson P, Bowra J, Milne J, et al. International Federation for Emergency Medicine Consensus Statement: Sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest (SHoC): an international consensus on the use of point of care ultrasound for undifferentiated hypotension and during cardiac arrest. Cjem 2017;19:459-70 https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2016.394.
Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Braunwald E. Time to add a fifth pillar to bedside physical examination: inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation, and insonation. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3:346-50 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0001.
Lewis D, Rang L, Kim D, et al. Recommendations for the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by emergency physicians in Canada. Cjem 2019;21:721-6 https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2019.392.
Marin JR, Abo AM, Arroyo AC, et al. Pediatric emergency medicine point-of-care ultrasound: summary of the evidence. Crit Ultrasound J 2016;8:16 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0049-5.
Tarique U, Tang B, Singh M, Kulasegaram KM, Ailon J. Ultrasound curricula in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37:69-82 https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14333.
Moses A, Weng W, Orchanian-Cheff A, Cavalcanti RB. Teaching point-of-care ultrasound in medicine: a scoping review. Can J Gen Intern Med, 2020;15(2), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.22374/cjgim.v15i2.368
Naciri A, Radid M, Kharbach A, Chemsi G. E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2021;18:27 https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.27.
Zavitz J, Sarwal A, Schoeneck J, et al. Virtual multi-specialty point-of-care ultrasound rotation for 4th year medical students during COVID-19: innovative teaching techniques improve ultrasound knowledge and image interpretation. AEM educ train. 2021:e10632 https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10632.
Ienghong K, Bhudhisawasdi V, Apiratwarakul K, Suzuki T, Tiamkao S, Gaysonsiri D. Point of care ultrasound training during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Open Access Macedonian J Med Sci 2021;9:443-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2021.6197.
Nix K, Liu EL, Oh L, et al. A distance-learning approach to point-of-care ultrasound training (ADAPT): a multi-institutional educational response during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Med. 2021;96:1711-6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004399.
Becker DM, Tafoya CA, Becker SL, Kruger GH, Tafoya MJ, Becker TK. The use of portable ultrasound devices in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Trop Med Int Health 2016;21:294-311 https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12657.
Sangra A, Vlachopoulos D, Cabrera N. Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: an approach to the conceptual framework. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 2012;13:145-159. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161
Galway LP, Corbett KK, Takaro TK, Tairyan K, Frank E. A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:181 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-181.
Meinert E, Eerens J, Banks C, et al. Exploring the cost of elearning in health professions education: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ 2021;7:e13681 https://doi.org/10.2196/13681.
Wilkinson JN, Saxhaug LM. Handheld ultrasound in training - the future is getting smaller! J Intensive Care Soc 2021;22:220-9 https://doi.org/10.1177/1751143720914216.
Marsh-Feiley G, Eadie L, Wilson P. Telesonography in emergency medicine: a systematic review. PLoS One 2018;13:e0194840 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194840.
Mulvagh SL, Bhagra A, Nelson BP, Narula J. Handheld ultrasound devices and the training conundrum: how to get to "seeing is believing". J Amer Soc Echocardio. 2014;27:310-3 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.01.011.
Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Incorporated; 2006.
Chenkin J, Lee S, Huynh T, Bandiera G. Procedures can be learned on the web: a randomized study of ultrasound-guided vascular access training. Acad emerg med 2008;15:949-54 https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00231.x.
Heiberg J, Hansen LS, Wemmelund K, et al. Point-of-Care clinical ultrasound for medical students. Ultrasound intern open 2015;1:E58-66 https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1565173.
Drake AE, Hy J, MacDougall GA, et al. Innovations with tele-ultrasound in education sonography: the use of tele-ultrasound to train novice scanners. ultrasound j 2021;13:6 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00210-0.
Kwan C, Pusic M, Pecaric M, Weerdenburg K, Tessaro M, Boutis K. The variable journey in learning to interpret pediatric point-of-care ultrasound images: a multicenter prospective cohort study. AEM Educ Train 2020;4:111-22 https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10375.
Florescu CC, Mullen JA, Nguyen VM, Sanders BE, Vu PQ-P. Evaluating didactic methods for training medical students in the use of bedside ultrasound for clinical practice at a faculty of medicine in Romania. J ultrasound med.2015;34:1873-82 https://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.14.09028.
Soon AW, Toney AG, Stidham T, Kendall J, Roosevelt G. Teaching point-of-care lung ultrasound to novice pediatric learners: web-based e-learning versus traditional classroom didactic. Ped emerg care 2020;36:317-21 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001482.
Hempel D, Haunhorst S, Sinnathurai S, et al. Social media to supplement point-of-care ultrasound courses: the "sandwich e-learning" approach. A randomized trial. Crit ultrasound j 2016;8:3 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0037-9.
Cawthorn TR, Nickel C, O'Reilly M, et al. Development and evaluation of methodologies for teaching focused cardiac ultrasound skills to medical students. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2014;27:302-9 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.12.006.
Haskins SC, Feldman D, Fields KG, et al. Teaching a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum to anesthesiology trainees with traditional didactic lectures or an online e-learning platform: a pilot study. JEPM 2018;20:E624. https://doi.org/10.46374/volxx-issue3-haskins
Kang TL, Berona K, Elkhunovich MA, et al. Web-based teaching in point-of-care ultrasound: an alternative to the classroom? Adv medical educ pract 2015;6:171-5 https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S72159.
Tainter CR, Wong NL, Cudemus-Deseda GA, Bittner EA. The "flipped classroom" model for teaching in the intensive care unit. J intensive care med. 2017;32:187-96 https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0885066616632156.
Chenkin J, McCartney CJL, Jelic T, Romano M, Heslop C, Bandiera G. Defining the learning curve of point-of-care ultrasound for confirming endotracheal tube placement by emergency physicians. Crit ultrasound j. 2015;7:14 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-015-0031-7.
Krishnan S, Kuhl T, Ahmed W, Togashi K, Ueda K. Efficacy of an online education program for ultrasound diagnosis of pneumothorax. Anesthesiology 2013;118:715-21 https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827f0979.
Ray JJ, Meizoso JP, Hart V, et al. Effectiveness of a perioperative transthoracic ultrasound training program for students and residents. J surgical educ. 2017;74:805-10 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.02.005.
Situ-LaCasse E, Acuna J, Huynh D, et al. Can ultrasound novices develop image acquisition skills after reviewing online ultrasound modules? BMC med educ. 2021;21:175 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02612-z.
Platz E, Liteplo A, Hurwitz S, Hwang J. Are live instructors replaceable? Computer vs. classroom lectures for EFAST training. J Emerg Med. 2011;40:534-8 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.08.030.
Soni NJ, Boyd JS, Mints G, et al. Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic. j ultrasound. 2021;13:39 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00242-6.
Gargani L, Sicari R, Raciti M, et al. Efficacy of a remote web-based lung ultrasound training for nephrologists and cardiologists: a LUST trial sub-project. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016;31:1982-8 https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw329.
Butler LT, Berry DC. Understanding the relationship between repetition priming and mere exposure. Br J Psychol 2004;95:467-87 https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369776.
van Merrienboer JJG, Kirschner PA, Kester L. Taking the load off a learner's mind: instructional design for complex learning. Educ Psychol. 2003;38:5-13 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3801_2.
Hempel D, Sinnathurai S, Haunhorst S, et al. Influence of case-based e-learning on students' performance in point-of-care ultrasound courses: a randomized trial. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016;23(4):298-304. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000270
Lin-Martore M, Olvera MP, Kornblith AE, et al. Evaluating a web-based point-of-care ultrasound curriculum for the diagnosis of intussusception. AEM Educ Train. 2021;5(3):e10526. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10526
Platz E, Goldflam K, Mennicke M, Parisini E, Christ M, Hohenstein C. Comparison of web-versus classroom-based basic ultrasonographic and EFAST training in 2 European hospitals. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(6):660-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.04.019
Riera A, Leviter JI, Iqbal A, Soma G, Malik RN, Chen L. Agreement with pediatric suprapatellar bursa effusion assessments by point-of-care ultrasound after remote training. Ped emerg care. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000002341
Brown KA, Riley AF, Alade KH, et al. A novel tool for teaching cardiac point-of-care ultrasound: an exploratory application of the design-based research approach. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21(12):e1113-e8. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000002441
Cuca C, Barth M, Scheiermann P, et al. Assessment of a new e-learning system on thorax, trachea, and lung ultrasound. Emerg Med Int. 2013;2013:145361. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/145361
Moro F, Mascilini F, Buonsenso D, et al. Validation of the performance of "fast lung ultrasound teaching program" for gynecologists/obstetricians dealing with pregnant women with suspicion of covid-19 infection: an italian prospective multicenter study. Ital J Gynaecol Obstet.2021;33(1):52-6. https://doi.org/10.36129/jog.33.01.06
Socransky S, Lang E, Bryce R, Betz M. Point-of-care ultrasound for jugular venous pressure assessment: live and online learning compared. Cureus. 2017;9(6):e1324. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1324
Edrich T, Stopfkuchen-Evans M, Song P, et al. A comparison of web-based with traditional classroom-based training of lung ultrasound for the exclusion of pneumothorax. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(1):123-8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001383
Fuchs L, Gilad D, Mizrakli Y, Sadeh Re, Galante O, Kobal S. Self-learning of point-of-care cardiac ultrasound - Can medical students teach themselves? PloS one. 2018;13(9):e0204087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204087
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Maya Harel-Sterling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
