Frailty Management Practices for Older Adults in Primary Care Clinics: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Objective: To describe practices used to diagnose and manage frailty in primary care clinics, prior to the implementation of the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement Initiative. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of the current frailty management practices in a convenience sample of five primary care clinics in Ottawa, Canada. Data was collected using a survey and qualitative content analysis of the survey data was performed. Results: None of the clinics had established a systematic frailty screening or management program. Primary care providers reported informally using select screening tools, clinical instinct, and case findings in their day-to-day practice to identify patients with frailty and refer them to community resources. Frailty identification and management varied across the clinics and across providers within the same clinic. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that primary care providers recognize the need to identify and manage frailty in their clinical practice. In the absence of guidelines or training, providers are developing their own strategies to address frailty.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).