Anti-abortion politics and changes in abortion, miscarriage, and stillbirth across time and social strata in Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/jcph.vi.79997Keywords:
abortion, miscarriage, abortion policy, Demographic and Health Survey, TurkeyAbstract
Abortion has been legal without restriction in Turkey since 1983. However, the government’s anti-abortion campaign in 2012 has resulted in significant restrictions on abortion services, particularly in public hospitals. Using six waves of the Turkish Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS), which was administered every five years from 1993 to 2018 (n=32,990), we investigated the trends in abortion, miscarriage, and stillbirth rates among ever-married women. We found that, compared to wave 2008, women in wave 2013 were seven percentage points less likely to report an abortion, while they were three percentage points more likely to report an experience of a miscarriage. This pattern continued largely also in the 2018 wave. This unprecedented decline in abortion was observed across all socioeconomic groups, with the strongest decline among lower educated and poorer women. Moreover, the increase in miscarriages was primarily driven by lower educated women and those outside of the richest wealth quintile. Our findings suggest that the government’s anti-abortion campaign led to reduced access to abortion services, and potential misreporting of abortions as miscarriages by reinforcing stigma towards both abortion seekers and providers. The findings underscore how an anti-abortion political climate can exacerbate existing social inequalities, even when abortion remains legal.
References
Agartan, T. (2012) Gender and health sector reform: Policies, actions and effects. In S. Dedeoglu & A.Y. Elveren (Eds.) Gender and society in Turkey: The impact of neoliberal policies, political Islam and EU accession (pp. 155–172). I.B.Tauris.
Aksoy, O., & Billari, F. C. (2018) Political Islam, marriage, and fertility: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 123(5), 1296–1340. https://doi.org/10.1086/696193
Ankara, H. G. (2017) Socioeconomic variations in induced abortion in Turkey. Journal of Biosocial Science, 49(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932016000158
Atay, H., Dedeoglu, B. E., Balkanci, U. B., Sadak, E., & Gomperts, R. (2022) Access to formal abortion services and demand for medical abortion in Turkey: A mixed-method study. Authorea Preprints.
Autorino, T., Mattioli, F., & Mencarini, L. (2020) The impact of gynecologists’ conscientious objection on abortion access. Social Science Research, 87, 102403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102403.
Berer, M. (2017) Abortion law and policy around the world: In search of decriminalization. Health and Human Rights, 19(1), 13-27.
Berro Pizzarossa, L., & Sosa, L. (2021) Abortion laws: The Polish symptom of a European malady? Ars Aequi, 2021, 587-595. http://clacaidigital.info/handle/123456789/1497
Buchbinder, M., Arora, K. S., McKetchnie, S. M., & Sabbath, E. L. (2025) Medical uncertainty in the shadow of Dobbs: Treating obstetric complications in a new reproductive frontier. Social Science & Medicine, 369, 117856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117856
Cindoglu, D., & Unal, D. (2017) Gender and sexuality in the authoritarian discursive strategies of ‘New Turkey’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816679003
Erkmen, S. (2020) Türkiye’de kürtaj: AKP ve biyopolitika. İletişim Yayınları.
Esengen, S. (2024) ‘We had that abortion together’: Abortion networks and access to il/legal abortions in Turkey. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 26(9) 1119-1133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2301410
Ganatra, B., & Hirve, S. (2002) Induced abortions among adolescent women in rural Maharashtra, India. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(19), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00016-2
Grimes, D. A., Benson, J., Singh, S., Romero, M., Ganatra, B., Okonofua, F. E., & Shah, I. H. (2006) Unsafe abortion: The preventable pandemic. The Lancet, 368(9550), 1908–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6
Harris, L. H., & Grossman, D. (2020) Complications of unsafe and self-managed abortion. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(11), 1029–1040. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMra1908412
Kancı, T., Çelik, B., Bekki, Y. B., & Tarcan, U. (2023) The anti-gender movement in Turkey: An analysis of its reciprocal aspects. Turkish Studies, 24(5), 882–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2022.2164189
Koc, I. (2000) Determinants of contraceptive use and method choice in Turkey. Journal of Biosocial Science, 32(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932000003291
Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.
Kumar, A., Hessini, L., & Mitchell, E. M. (2009) Conceptualising abortion stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(6), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902842741
Küng, S. A., Darney, B. G., Saavedra-Avendaño, B., Lohr, P. A., & Gil, L. (2018) Access to abortion under the heath exception: A comparative analysis in three countries. Reproductive Health, 15 (107), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0548-x
Lindberg, L., Kost, K., Maddow-Zimet, I., Desai, S., & Zolna, M. (2020) Abortion reporting in the United States: An assessment of three national fertility surveys. Demography, 57(3), 899–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00886-4
MacFarlane, K. A., O’Neil, M. L., Tekdemir, D., Çetin, E., Bilgen, B., & Foster, A. M. (2016) Politics, policies, pronatalism, and practice: Availability and accessibility of abortion and reproductive health services in Turkey. Reproductive Health Matters, 24(48), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.11.002
MacFarlane, K. A., O’Neil, M. L., Tekdemir, D., & Foster, A. M. (2017) “It was as if society didn’t want a woman to get an abortion”: A qualitative study in Istanbul, Turkey. Contraception, 95(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.190
Millar, E. (2022) Maintaining exceptionality: Interrogating gestational limits for abortion. Social & Legal Studies, 31(3), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639211032317
Moore, B., Poss, C., Coast, E., Lattof, S. R., & van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (2021) The economics of abortion and its links with stigma: A secondary analysis from a scoping review on the economics of abortion. PloS One, 16(2), e0246238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246238
O’Neil, M. L. (2017) The availability of abortion at state hospitals in Turkey: A national study. Contraception, 95(2), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.009
O’Neil, M. L., Ramaswamy, A., & Altuntaş, D. (2024) Population politics, reproductive governance and access to abortion in Turkey. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 26(10), 1316-1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2024.2317734
Pekkurnaz, D. (2020) Employment Status and Contraceptive Choices of Women With Young Children in Turkey. Feminist Economics, 26(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2019.1642505
Pekkurnaz, D., Ökem, Z. G., & Çakar, M. (2021) Understanding women’s provider choice for induced abortion in Turkey. Health Policy, 125(10), 1385–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.015
Saluk, S. (2022) Datafied pregnancies: Health information technologies and reproductive governance in Turkey. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 36(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12675
Saluk, S. (2023) Fraternal natalism: Demographic anxieties and the righteous state in Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 98, 102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102751
Sambaiga, R., Haukanes, H., Moland, K. M., & Blystad, A. (2019) Health, life and rights: A discourse analysis of a hybrid abortion regime in Tanzania. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1039-6
Saraç, M., & Koç, İ. (2020) Increasing misreporting levels of induced abortion in Turkey: Is this due to social desirability bias? Journal of Biosocial Science, 52(2), 213–229. doi:10.1017/S0021932019000397
Shellenberg, K. M. (2010) Abortion stigma in the United States: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives from women seeking an abortion. The Johns Hopkins University.
Strong, J., Coast, E., & Nandagiri, R. (2023) Abortion, stigma, and intersectionality. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of social sciences and global public health (pp. 1579–1600). Springer.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023) World Population Policies 2021. United Nations. https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210000949
VandeVusse, A. J., Mueller, J., Kirstein, M., Strong, J., & Lindberg, L. D. (2023) “Technically an abortion”: Understanding perceptions and definitions of abortion in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 335, 116216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116216
Yavuz, S. (2006) Completing the fertility transition: Third birth developments by language groups in Turkey. Demographic Research, 15 (15), 435–460. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.
Yüksel, Y. (2013) In search of a pronatalist population policy for Turkey: A gender perspective. Economic and Social Research Council Seminar Posttransitional Fertility in Developing Countries: Causes and Implications. Oxford.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Selin Köksal, Francesco C. Billari, Ozan Aksoy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles in the Journal of Critical Public Health are published under a CC-BY-NC-ND license, or a CC-BY license if authors or their funders require this. The default CC-BY-NC-ND license means that authors and users may copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in un-adapted form only, for non-commercial purposes only, and only so long as proper credit is given (as is customary in academic work). Authors retain copyright of their work published in Journal of Critical Public Health and full publishing rights without restrictions
