Do Hypnosis and Mindfulness Practices Inhabit a Common Domain? Implications for Research, Clinical Practice, and Forensic Science

##article.authors##

  • Steven Lynn
  • Anne Malaktaris Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York, 13902-6000, United States of America
  • Reed Maxwell
  • David I. Mellinger Kaiser Permanente, Behavioral Health Care, Sherman Terrace, 18040 Sherman Way, Reseda, California 91335 United States of America
  • Delana van der Kloet Department of Clinical Psychological Science Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht

##article.abstract##

Hypnosis and mindfulness practices provide clinicians with two viable yet distinct methods, or more accurately families of methods, for increasing well-being and ameliorating problems in living. In this article, we compare and contrast hypnotic and mindfulness interventions, address the question of whether they inhabit a common domain, describe how they may be combined to advantage, and discuss clinical and research implications. We contend that hypnosis and mindfulness inhabit a common, albeit broad, domain of suggestive approaches. However, we also argue that meaningful differences exist that are particularly salient and consequential in the forensic arena.

##submission.downloads##

##submissions.published##

2012-07-31