Team-designed improvement of writing and critical thinking in large undergraduate courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.2.1.39Keywords:
team-design, cognitive apprenticeship, critical thinking, writing, assessmentAbstract
Helping students achieve advanced critical thinking and writing skills in large undergraduate classes is a challenge faced by many university faculty members. We addressed this challenge in a three-year project using team course design, built around a cognitive apprenticeship model, to enhance undergraduates’ writing, critical thinking, and research skills in courses ranging in size from 70 to over 400 students. Faculty members partnered with specialists from the university library, writing center, and teaching center, and with graduate student fellows who received supplemental training in those units. Together they designed progressive learning activities and written assignments based on meaningful, situated critical thinking scenarios. Instruction teams also developed rubrics for tracking students’ progress on each step, and they used this information to inform the next wave of course enhancements and generate continual and iterative improvement. Assessments developed by the instruction teams showed that students in the team-designed courses improved in their critical thinking and writing skills from the beginning to the end of the semester. Furthermore, an evaluation of student work from the team-designed courses using the AA C&U Value rubrics showed that these students displayed more advanced critical thinking and writing skills than students in roughly comparable but conventionally designed courses. Our results demonstrate that team design involving specialists and graduate students can be a feasible and worthwhile strategy for engaging faculty members in developing advanced instructional and assessment designs that enhance high-end learning in a large university setting.
Metrics
References
Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) (2002). Greater Expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. National Panel Report available at http://greaterexpectations.org/ (retrieved 17 July 2013).
Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) (2013). VALUE: Valid assessment of learning in undergraduate education. http://www.aacu.org/value/index.cfm (retrieved 30 June 2013).
Bean, J. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). (Eds.) How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Hollum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6(11), 38-46.
Greenhoot, A.F., & Bernstein, D. (2011/2012). Using the VALUE rubric as a tool in evaluating a teaching innovation. Peer Review, Fall 2011/Winter 2012, 22-26.
Hutchings, P. & Shulman, L.S (1999). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Change, 31 (5), 11-15.
Iannuzzi, P. (1998). Faculty development and information literacy: Establishing campus partnerships. Reference Services Review, 26, 97-102.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McLeod, S.H. (Ed.). (1988). Strengthening programs for writing across the curriculum. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
McLeod, S.H. & Soven, M. (Eds). (1992). Writing across the curriculum: A guide to developing programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, W. & Pellen, R.M. (Eds). (2005). Libraries beyond their institutions: Partnerships that work. Binghamton, NY : Haworth Press.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied Linear Statistical Models. Boston, MA: Irwin.
Raspa, R. & Ward, D. (Eds.). (2000). The collaborative imperative: Librarians and faculty working together in the information universe. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
Rockman, I.F. (Ed.). (2004). Integrating information literacy into the higher education curriculum: Practical models for transformation. New York, NY : Wiley.
Shulman, L.S. (2004). Teaching as community property: Essays on higher education. P. Hutchings (Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd Edition). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
