Making meaning from student evaluations of teaching: Seeing beyond our own horizons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.10Keywords:
Student evaluations of teaching, nursing education, student feedback, hermeneutics, listeningAbstract
Within postsecondary education, the assessment of effective teaching has largely relied upon student evaluations of teaching. However, the process through which teachers make sense of their student evaluations is unclear. A research team of six undergraduate nursing students and four nursing educators explored the research question: How do nursing educators make meaning from their student evaluations of teaching? Gadamerian hermeneutics guided unstructured interviews with nursing educators working at a Middle East campus of a Canadian university. The interview transcripts were interpreted through a process of naïve readings, rereadings, interpretive dialogues, and interpretive writing that generated the following hermeneutic interpretations:
- Teachers make meaning of their student evaluation through generalized subjective characterizations of students and through their expressed intentions for their teacher-student relationships.
- Some of these characterizations and expressed intentions obscured what truths could be learned from the student evaluations of teaching.
- The experience of receiving critical student feedback invoked a personal response, at the same time, paradoxically, teachers worked hard to “not take it personally.”
We suggest the practice of deep listening as a way to understand students’ feedback. The main takeaway message from this research is that teachers need a supportive and sustaining community of peers who are also open to listening deeply to the truths embedded in student evaluations of teaching.
Metrics
References
Ballantyne, R., Borthwick, J., & Packer, J. (2000). Beyond student evaluation of teaching: Identifying and addressing academic staff development needs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611430
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslaysky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4). 332-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
Beran, T. N., & Rokosh, J. L. (2009). Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction. Instructional Science, 37(2), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9045-2
Berk, R. A., Naumann, P. L., & Appling, S. E. (2004). Beyond student ratings: Peer observation of classroom and clinical teaching. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 1(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1024
Carper, B. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Advances in Nursing Society, 1(1), 13-24. Clayson, D. E., & Haley, E. A. (2011). Are students telling us the truth? A critical look at the student evaluation of teaching. Marketing Education Review, 21(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.2753/MER1052-8008210201
Cleary, M., Happell, B., Lau, S. T., & Mackey, S. (2013). Student feedback on teaching: Some issues for consideration for nurse educators. International Journal of Nursing Practice 19(S1), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12018
Contradiction. (n.d. a) Online Etymological Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=contradiction&searchmode=none
Contradiction. (n.d. b). Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contradiction
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (2005). The Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Emmelman, D. S., & DeCesare, M. (2007). College students’ perceptions of their “best” and “worst” courses and instructors. International Review of Modern Sociology, 33(2), 227-244. https://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/soc_facpub/2
Frick, T. W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., & Zlatkovska, E. (2010). Improving course evaluations to improve instruction and complex learning in higher education. Education Technology Research Development, 58(2), 115¬136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40603152
Gadamer, H-G. (1989). Truth and Method (2nd rev. ed.) (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley. Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236380
Lindahl, M. W., & Unger, M. L. (2010). Cruelty in student teaching evaluations. College Teaching, 58(3), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550903253643
Maturana, H. R. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity of the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 25-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.1988.10557705
Moore, S., & Kuol, N. (2005). Students evaluating teachers: Exploring the importance of faculty reaction to feedback on teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251052000305534
Moules, N. J. (2002). Hermeneutic inquiry: Paying heed to history and Hermes-An ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(3), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100301
Moules, N. J., McCaffrey, G. P., Field, J. C., & Laing, C. M. (2015). Conducting Hermeneutic Research: From Philosophy to Practice. New York: Peter Lang.
Noise (n.d.). Online Etymological Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.etymonline.com/word/noise#etymonline_v_9738
Powell, N. J., Rubenstein, C., Sawin, E. M., & Annan, S. (2014). Student evaluations of teaching tools: A qualitative examination of student perceptions. Nurse Educator, 39(6), 274-279. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000066
Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks-exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597200
Schmelkin, L. P., Spencer, K. J., & Gellman, E. S. (1997). Faculty perspectives on course and teacher evaluations. Research in Higher Education, 38(5), 575-592. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024996413417
Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology for self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. vol. 38 (pp. 183-242). New York: Academic Press.
Smith, K., & Welicker-Pollak, M. (2008). What can they say about my teaching? Teacher educators’ attitudes to standardized student evaluation of teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802000248
Speziale, H. J. S., & Carpenter, D. R. (2003). Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Perspective (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Steiner, S., Holley, L. C., Gerdes, K., & Campbell, H. E. (2006). Evaluating teaching: Listening to students while acknowledging bias. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(2), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2006.200404113
Tanner, W. P., & Swets, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychology Review, 61(6), 401¬409. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0058700
Tapp, D. M. (2001). Conserving the vitality of suffering: Addressing family constraints to illness conversations. Nursing Inquiry, 8(4), 254-263. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1800.2001.00118.x
Zabaleta, F. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131
