Enhancing student engagement through an institutional blended learning initiative: A case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.2.8Keywords:
active learning, blended learning, case study, higher education, student engagementAbstract
Tertiary education institutions grapple with how to better engage students in their learning in high-enrolment, introductory courses. This paper presents a case study that examines a large-scale, faculty-level course redesign project in which this challenge was addressed through the use of blended learning models. The main research question was: Are students in blended formats engaged in their learning differently than those in the traditional formats? The first part of this paper describes the institutional policies, processes, and practices that were established to implement the course redesign project. The second part of the paper focuses on the effectiveness of the project, presenting the results of a longitudinal research study that examined changes in student engagement using the Classroom Survey of Student Engagement (CLASSE). The implications of the longitudinal evaluation and institutional strategy, structure, and support components are examined critically, as well as the project’s impact on students and on the larger university.
Metrics
References
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M. Lovett, M. C., Norman, M. K., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
Foyle, H.C. (1995). Interactive Learning in the Higher Education Classroom. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smiths, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles and Guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2013). Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies. Internet and Higher Education 18, 24-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.001
Graham, C., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 18, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Ciccone, A. (2011). The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Reconsidered: Institutional Integration and Impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates (2005). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Leger, A., Godlewska, A., Adjei, J., Schaefli, L., Whetstone, S. Finlay, J., Roy, R., & Massey, J. (2013). Large First-Year Course Re-design to Promote Student Engagement and Student Learning. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and Instruction. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Niemiec, M. & Otte, G. (2009). An administrator’s guide to the whys and hows of blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 19-30. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/104025/
Ouimet, J. A., & Smallwood, R.A. (2005). CLASSE—The class-level survey of student engagement. Assessment Update, 17(6), 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/au.176
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Picciano, A. G. 2006. Blended learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(3), 95-102. Retrieved from https://www.anthonypicciano.com/articles.html
Pike, G. R. (2006). The convergent and discriminant validity of NSSE scalelet scores. Journal of College
Student Development, 47(5), 550-563. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/article/201904
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education-Washington, 93(3), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Ragan, E. D., Jennings, S. R., Massey, J. D., & Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture classes. Computers & Education, 78, 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.002
Twigg, C. A. (2000). Course-readiness criteria: Identifying targets of opportunity for large-scale redesign. Educause Review, 35(3), 41-49. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/articles/2000/5/erm0033.pdf?la=en
Twigg, C. (2004). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: Lessons Learned from Round Ill of the Pew Grant Program in Course Redesign. Troy: National Center for Academic Transformation. Retrieved from http://www.thencat.org/PCR/RdIIILessons.pdf
Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-learning, 6(1), 81-94. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/6310/
Vaughan, N. D. (2010). A blended community of inquiry approach: Linking student engagement and course redesign. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 60-65. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/108367/
Vaughan, N. D., Zimmer, J., and Villamar, F. (2011). Student engagement and interactive technologies: What’s the connection? International Journal of Excellence in E-Learning, 4(1). Retrieved from https://journals.hbmsu.ac.ae/Pages/Articles.aspx?AlD=198&11D=46
Wallace, L., & Young, J. (2010). Implementing blended learning: Policy implications for universities. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/52603/
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787410379680.
