Beyond the conference: Singing our SSONG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.4Keywords:
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, small significant networks, community, design-based researchAbstract
The International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) annual conference presents an exciting opportunity to meet with international colleagues from diverse backgrounds and situations to commune on our common interest in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL). As with every ISSOTL conference, the enthusiasm for SoTL was palpable in Los Angeles in 2016. Rich discussions took place, networks were formed, and promises to keep in touch were made. Unfortunately, previous conference experiences have taught us that these good intentions often fall short once the conference bubble has burst and the reality of daily life sets in once more. In an attempt to circumvent this phenomenon, we—seven colleagues from three different countries—embarked on a research project that enabled us to maintain the relationships and fruitful discussions we had initiated at ISSOTL16. We established Small, Significant Online Network Group, or SSONG, inspired by a conference workshop on small significant networks. As a group, we met regularly online using Adobe Connect© and engaged in significant conversations around SoTL that were private, trustful, and intellectually intriguing. This article reflects our experiences in establishing and maintaining the group. We discuss how the group was formed; its alignment with the concept of small, significant networks; and the benefits and challenges we encountered. Four key principles of the group that have emerged will also be discussed in detail, enabling readers to consider how they could adapt the concept for their own purposes.
Metrics
References
Bitzer, E. M. (2010). A university department as a community of practice: A quality promotion perspective. South African Journal of Higher Education, 24(1), 15–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v24i1.63426
Blair, E. (2013). The challenge of contextualizing the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.127
Cambridge University Press. (2008). Cambridge academic content dictionary. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.129
Cox, M. D. (2013). The impact of communities of practice in support of early-career academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.599600
Engin, M., & Atkinson, F. (2015). Faculty learning communities: A model for supporting curriculum changes in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(2), 164–174. Retreived from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/abstract.cfm?mid=1948
Evans, C., Yeung, E., Markoulakis, R., & Guilcher, S. (2014) An online community of practice to support evidence-based physiotherapy practice in manual therapy. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 34(4), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21253
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.121
Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Kervin, L., & Ferry, B. (2006). The design of an online community of practice for beginning teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6, 120–132. Retreived from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/21095/
Huber, M. T., & Robinson, J. M. (2016). Mapping advocacy and outreach for the scholarship of teaching and learning. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(1), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.4.1.3
Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marcketti, S., van der Zanden, A. M., & Leptien, J. R. (2015). SoTL champions: Leveraging their lessons learned. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090104
Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011). Developing a quality culture through the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.536972
McKinney, K. (2015). The more things change, the more they stay the same. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090102
McMillan, W., & Gordon, N. (2017). Being and becoming a university teacher. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(4), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1236781
McMorrow, S. L., DeCleene Huber, K. E., & Wiley, S. (2017). Capacity building to improve interprofessional collaboration through a faculty learning community. Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1371
McNaughton, D., & Vostal, B. R. (2010). Using active listening to improve collaboration with parents: The LAFF don't CRY strategy. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45(4), 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451209353443
Mighty, J. (2013). One important lesson I've learned from my involvement with SoTL. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.113
Mipham, S. (2017). The lost art of good conversation: A mindful way to connect with others and enrich everyday life. New York, NY: Harmony Books.
Morrish, E. (2015, September 14). Networking our way through Neoliberal U. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://academicirregularities.wordpress.com/2015/09/14/networking-our-way-through-neoliberal-u/
Pataraia, N., Falconer, I., Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Fincher, S. (2014). “Who do you talk to about your teaching?”: Networking activities among university teachers. Frontline Learning Research, 5, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.89
Poole, G., Verwoord, R., & Iqbal, I. (2016, October 12–15). Tales of teaching and learning: Whose stories matter to you and why? Paper presented at the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSOTL) annual conference, Los Angeles, CA.
Poole, G., Iqbal, I., & Verwoord, R. (2018). Small significant networks as birds of a feather. International Journal for Academic Development, 23, 1¬–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1492924
Pyörälä, E., Hirsto, L., Toom, A., Myyry, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2015). Significant networks and meaningful conversations observed in the first-round applicants for the teachers’ academy at a research-intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1029484
Rienties, B., & Hosein, A. (2015). Unpacking (in)formal learning in an academic development programme: a mixed-method social network perspective. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1029928
Rosenberg, M. B. (2015). Nonviolent communication: A language of life (3rd ed.). Encinitas, CA: PuddleDancer Press.
Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597200
Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2012). How effects from teacher training of academic teachers propagate into the meso level and beyond. In E. Simon & G. Pleschova (Eds.), Teacher development in higher education: Existing programs, program impact, and future trends (pp. 213–233). London: Routledge.
Sherer, P. D., Shea, T. P., & Kristensen, E. (2003). Online communities of practice: A catalyst for faculty development. Innovative Higher Education, 27(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022355226924
Shulman, L. S. (1993). Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude. Change, 25(6), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1993.9938465
Thomson, K. (2015). Informal conversations about teaching and their relationship to a formal development program: learning opportunities for novice and mid-career academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 20(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2015.1028066
Trigwell, K. (2013). Evidence of the impact of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning purposes. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.1.95
Van Waes, S., De Maeyer, S., Moolenaar, N. M., Van Petegem, P., & Van den Bossche, P. (2018). Strengthening networks: A social network intervention among higher education teachers. Learning and Instruction, 53, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.07.005
Van Waes, S., Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Heldens, H. H. P. F., Donche, V., Van Petegem, P., & Van den Bossche, P. (2016). The networked instructor: The quality of networks in different stages of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.022
Van Waes, S., Van den Bossche, P., Moolenaar, N. M., Stes, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). Uncovering changes in university teachers’ professional networks during an instructional development program. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.003
Verwoord, R., & Poole, G. (2016). The role of small significant networks and leadership in institutional embedding of SoTL. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2016(146), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20190
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015a). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from https://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/07-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdf
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015b). Key success and failure factors. Retrieved from https://wenger-trayner.com/project/key-success-and-failure-factors/
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3. Retrieved from https://thesystemsthinker.com/communities-of-practice-learning-as-a-social-system/
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Williams, A. L., Verwoord, R., Beery, T. A., Dalton, H., McKinnon, J., Strickland, K., . . . Poole, G. (2013). The power of social networks: A model for weaving the scholarship of teaching and learning into institutional culture. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.1.2.49
Zhang, W., & Watts, S. (2008). Online communities as communities of practice: A case study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810884255
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Corinne A. Green, Michelle J. Eady, Marian McCarthy, Ashley B. Akenson, Briony Supple, Jacinta McKeon, James Cronin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.