Using Asynchronous, Online Discussion Forums to Explore How Life Sciences Students Approach an Ill-Structured Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.1.11Keywords:
ill-structured problems, problem scope, asynchronous online discussion forum, feedback, grounded theoryAbstract
To foster students’ learning of critical-thinking skills, I previously introduced ill-structured problems to provide students opportunities to apply content knowledge and thinking skills. However, I noted that my third-year, life sciences students were not solving such problems effectively. Therefore, I used a grounded approach and conducted content analysis of students’ forum discussions to understand their problem-solving approaches. The students worked in small groups using asynchronous, online discussion forums (AODFs) to discuss their approaches to solving an ill-structured problem posed. Each group submitted their solution to the problem in an essay. From my analysis of students’ posts at AODFs, students seemed fairly competent in using domain-specific knowledge and certain domain-general skills in scientific argumentation. However, they lacked the ability to properly define the problem scope and, consequently, failed to address the problem adequately. The study illuminated students’ challenges and provided me possible ways to plan relevant scaffolds in subsequent iterations of the activity.
Metrics
References
Aikenhead, Glen S. 1996. “Science Education: Border Crossing into the Subculture of Science.” Studies in Science Education 27, no. 1: 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077.
Anderson, John R. 1993. “Problem Solving and Learning.” American Psychologist 48, no. 1: 35–44.
Andresen, Martin A. 2009. “Asynchronous Discussion Forums: Success Factors, Outcomes, Assessments, and Limitations.” Educational Technology & Society 12, no. 1: 249–57.
Arum, Richard, and Josipa Roksa. 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. University of Chicago Press.
Belkin, Douglas. 2015. “Test Finds College Graduates Lack Skills for White-Collar Jobs.” Wall Street Journal, 1–4. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/test-finds-many-students-ill-prepared-to-enter-work-force-1421432744.
Brewer, Carol A., and Diane Smith. 2011. “Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action.” American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 81.
Bryant, Anthony, and Kathy Charmaz. 2007a. “Grounding Categories.” In The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by Anthony Bryant and Kathy Charmaz, 166–91. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Bryant, Anthony, and Kathy Charmaz. 2007b. “The Coding Process and Its Challenges.” In SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory The Coding Process and Its Challenges, edited by Anthony Bryant and Kathy Charmaz, 265–90. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Byun, Hyunjung, Jung Lee, and Frank A. Cerreto. 2013. “Relative Effects of Three Questioning Strategies in Ill-Structured, Small Group Problem Solving.” Instructional Science 42, no. 2: 229–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9278-1.
Chen, Ching-Huei, and Amy C. Bradshaw. 2007. “The Effect of Web-Based Question Prompts on Scaffolding Knowledge Integration and Ill-Structured Problem Solving.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39, no. 4: 359. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782487.
Choi, Aeran, and Brian. Hand. 2019. “Students’ Construct and Critique of Claims and Evidence through Online Asynchronous Dscussion Combined with In-Class Discussion.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10005-4.
Choi, Ikseon, and Kyunghwa Lee. 2009. “Designing and Implementing a Case-Based Learning Environment for Enhancing Ill-Structured Problem Solving: Classroom Management Problems for Prospective Teachers.” Educational Technology Research and Development 57, no. 1: 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9089-2.
Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education (7th ed.). Routledge.
Daniels, Harry. 2005. An Introduction to Vygotsky. (H. Daniels, Ed.) (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
DeHaan, Robert L. 2005. “The Impending Revolution in Undergraduate Science Education.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 14, no. 2: 253–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-4425-3.
Dringenberg, Emily, and Senay Purzer. 2018. “Experiences of First-Year Engineering Students Working on Ill-Structured Problems in Teams.” Journal of Engineering Education 107, no. 3: 442–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20220.
Dysthe, Olga. 2002. “The Learning Potential of a Web-Mediated Discussion in a University Course. Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 3: 339–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220000716.
Galikyan, Irene, and Wilfried Admiraal. 2019. “Students’ Engagement in Asynchronous Online Discussion: The Relationship between Cognitive Presence, Learner Prominence, and Academic Performance.” Internet and Higher Education, 43(August 2018), 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692.
Gao, Fei A., Tanyi B. Zhang, and Teresa C. Franklin. 2012. “Designing Asynchronous Online Discussion Environments: Recent Progress and Possible Future Directions.” British Journal of Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84862507080&partnerID=40&md5=a8b667969967c02eb4dfeac1254385cf.
Ge, Xun, and Susan M. Land. 2003. “Scaffolding Students’ Problem-Solving Processes in an Ill-Structured Task Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions.” Educational Technology Research and Development 51, no. 1: 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515.
Giacumo, Lisa A., and Wilhelmina Savenye. 2020. “Asynchronous Discussion Forum Design to Support Cognition: Effects of Rubrics and Instructor Prompts on Learner’s Critical Thinking, Achievement, and Satisfaction.” Educational Technology Research and Development 68, no. 1: 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09664-5.
Gil-pérez, Daniel, Jenaro Guisasola, Antonio Moreno, Antonio Cachapuz, Anna M. Pessoa De Carvalho, Joaquín Martínez Torregrosa, Julia Salinas, Pablo Valdés, Eduardo González, Anna Gené Duch, Andrée Dumas-Carré, Hugo Tricárico, and Rómulo Gallego. 2002. “Defending Constructivism in Science Education.” Science & Education 11: 557–71.
Glaser, B. G. 2008. “Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1, no. 2: 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F160940690200100203.
Gunawardena, Charlotte N., Constance A. Lowe, and Terry Anderson. 1997. “Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 17, no. 4: 397–431.
Henri, France. 1992. “Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis.” In Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, edited by A. R. Kaye, 117–36. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Hmelo-Silver, Cindy E. 2004. “Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?” Educational Psychology Review 16, no. 3: 235–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
Hou, Huei-Tse. 2011. “A Case Study of Online Instructional Collaborative Discussion Activities for Problem-Solving Using Situated Scenarios: An Examination of Content and Behavior Cluster Analysis.” Computers and Education 56, no. 3: 712–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.013.
Hrastinski, Stefan. 2009. “A Theory of Online Learning as Online Participation.” Computers & Education 52, no.1: 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.009.
Hung, Woei, and Ademola Amida. 2020. “Problem-Based Learning in College Science.” In Active Learning in College Science, edited by Joel Mintzes and Emily M. Walter, 325–39. Springer, Cham.
Jonassen, David H. 1997. “Instructional Design Models for Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Learning Outcomes.” Educational Technology Research and Development 1: 65–94.
Jonassen, David H. 2011. Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-solving Learning Environment. Routledge. https://doi.org/doi:10.4324/9780203847527.
Jonassen, David H., Demei Shen, Rose M. Marra, Young Hoan Cho, Jenny L. Lo, and Vinod K. Lohani. 2009. “Engaging and Supporting Problem Solving in Engineering Ethics.” Journal of Engineering Education 98, no. 3: 235–54.
Jorczak, Robert L., and D. N. Dupuis. 2014. “Differences in Classroom Versus Online Exam Performance Due to Asynchronous Discussion.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network 18, no. 2: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.408.
Kim, Joo Yeun, and Kyu Yon Lim. 2019. “Promoting Learning in Online, Ill-Structured Problem Solving: The Effects of Scaffolding Type and Metacognition Level.” Computers and Education 138 (May): 116–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.001.
Kim, Kyoungna, Priya Sharma, Susan M. Land, and Kevin P. Furlong. 2012. “Effects of Active Learning on Enhancing Student Critical Thinking in an Undergraduate General Science Course.” Innovative Higher Education 38, no. 3: 223–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9236-x.
Kolb, Alice Y., and David A. Kolb. 2005. “Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 4, no. 2: 193–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566.
Kozulin, Alex, Boris Gindis, Vladimir Ageyev, and Suzanne M. Miller. 2003. “Introduction: Sociocultural Theory and Education: Students, Teachers, and Knowledge.” In Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context, edited by Alex Kozulin, Boris Gindis, Vladimir Ageyev, and Suzanne M. Miller, 1–12. Cambridge University Press.
Land, Susan M. 2000. “Cognitive Requirements for Learning with Open-Ended Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 48, no. 3: 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319858.
Malkin, Albert, Ruth Anne Rehfeldt, and Ashley M. Shayter. 2018. “An Investigation of the Efficacy of Asynchronous Discussion on Students’ Performance in an Online Research Method Course.” Behavior Analysis in Practice 11, no. 3: 274–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0157-5.
Marra, Rose M., Joi L. Moore, and Aimee K. Klimczak. 2004. “Content Analysis of Online Discussion Forums: A Comparative Analysis of Protocols.” Educational Technology Research and Development 52, no. 2: 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504837.
Murphy, Elizabeth. 2004. “Recognising and Promoting Collaboration in an Online Asynchronous Discussion.” British Journal of Educational Technology 35, no. 4: 421–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00401.x.
Ng, Connie S. L., Wing Sum Cheung, and Khe Foon Hew. 2010. “Investigating Singapore Pre-Service Teachers’ Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Processes in an Asynchronous Online Environment: Implications for Reflective Thinking.” Interactive Learning Environments 18, no. 2: 115–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802337629.
Ng, Connie S. L., and Charlene Tan. 2006. “Investigating Singapore Pre-Service Teachers’ Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Processes in an Asynchronous Online Environment: Implications for Reflective Thinking.” New Horizons in Education 45, no. 54: 1–15. Retrieved from http://www.hkta1934.org.hk/NewHorizon/index2.html.
Osborne, Debora M., Jacqui H. Byrne, Debbie L. Massey, and Amy N. B. Johnston. 2018. “Use of Online Asynchronous Discussion Boards to Engage Students, Enhance Critical Thinking, and Foster Staff-Student/Student-Student Collaboration: A Mixed Method Study.” Nurse Education Today 70(June): 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.014.
Osborne, Jonathan. 2010. “Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 328, no. 5977: 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944.
Parks-Stamm, Elizabeth J., Maria Zafonte, and Stephanie M. Palenque. 2017. “The Effects of Instructor Participation and Class Size on Student Participation in an Online Class Discussion Forum.” British Journal of Educational Technology 48, no. 6: 1250–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12512.
Resnick, Lauren B. 1987. Education and Learning to Think. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Rourke, Liam, Terry Anderson, D. Randy Garrison, and Walter Archer. 2001. “Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12: 8–22. Retrieved from https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197319.
Sarsfield, Eileen. 2014. “Differences between Novices’ and Experts’ Solving Ill-Structured Problems.” Public Health Nursing 31, no. 5: 444–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12100.
Schellens, Tammy, and Martin Valcke. 2006. “Fostering Knowledge Construction in University Students through Asynchronous Discussion Groups.” Computers and Education 46, no. 4: 349–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.010.
Schrire, Sarah. 2006. “Knowledge Building in Asynchronous Discussion Groups: Going beyond Quantitative Analysis.” Computers and Education 46, no. 1: 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.006.
Schwab, J. J. 1960. “Teacher, Inquiry, the Science and the Educator.” The School Review 68, no. 2: 176–95.
Shin, Namsoo, David H. Jonassen, and Steven McGee. 2003. “Predictors of Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Problem Solving in an Astronomy Simulation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40, no. 1: 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10058.
Simon, Herbert A. 1977. “The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems.” In Models of Discovery 304–25. Springer Netherlands.
Strauss, Anselm L. 1987a. “Codes and Coding.” In Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, 55–81. Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, Anselm L. 1987b. “Introduction.” In Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, 1–39. Cambridge University Press.
Strijbos, Jan-Wilhem, Rob L. Martens, Frans J. Prins, and Wim M.G. Jochems. 2006. “Content Analysis: What Are They Talking About?” Computers & Education 46, no. 1: 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.002.
Tawfik, Andrew. A., Victor Law, Xun Ge, Wanli Xing, and Kyung Kim. 2018. “The Effect of Sustained vs. Faded Scaffolding on Students’ Argumentation in Ill-Structured Problem Solving.” Computers in Human Behavior 87: 436–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.035.
Tobias, Sigmund, and Thomas M. Duffy. 2009. “The Success or Failure of Constructivist Instruction: An Introduction.” In Constructivist Instruction? Success or Failure?, edited by Sigmund Tobias and Thomas Duffy, 3–10. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878842.
Tsaushu, Masha, Tali Tal, Ornit Sagy, Yael Kali, Shimon Gepstein, and Dan Zilberstein. 2012. “Peer Learning and Support of Technology in an Undergraduate Biology Course to Enhance Deep Learning.” CBE Life Sciences Education 11, no. 4: 402–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-04-0042.
Voss, James F. 1987. “Learning and Transfer in Subject-Matter Learning: A Problem-Solving Model.” International Journal of Educational Research 11, no. 6: 607–22.
Vygotsky, Lev. 1980. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Qiyun, and Huay Lit Woo. 2007. “Comparing Asynchronous Online Discussions and Face-to-Face Discussions in a Classroom Setting.” British Journal of Educational Technology 38, no. 2: 272–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00621.x.
Webb, Noreen M. 1989. “Peer Interaction and Learning in Small Groups.” International Journal of Educational Research 13, no. 1: 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1.
Wismath, Shelly, Doug Orr, and Bruce Mackay. 2015. “Threshold Concepts in the Development of Problem-Solving Skills.” Teaching & Learning Inquiry 3, no. 1: 63–73. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148616.pdf.
Wood, Wiliam B. 2009. “Innovations in Teaching Undergraduate Biology and Why We Need Them.” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 25: 93–112.
Xie, Kui, and Amy C. Bradshaw. 2008. “Using Question Prompts to Support Ill-Structured Problem Solving in Online Peer Collaborations.” International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 4, no. 2: 148–65.
Xun, Ge, and Susan M. Land. 2004. “A Conceptual Framework for Scaffolding Ill-Structured Problem-Solving Processes Using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions.” Educational Technology Research and Development 52, no. 2: 5–22.
Yu, Kuang-Chao, Szu-Chun Fan, and Kuen-Yi Lin. 2015. “Enhancing Students’ Problem-Solving Skills through Context-Based Learning.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13, no. 6: 1377–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4.
Zhong, Lin, and Xinhao Xu. 2019. “Developing Real Life Problem-Solving Skills through Situational Design: A Pilot Study.” Educational Technology Research and Development 67, no. 6: 1529–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09691-2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Foong May Yeong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
