EdVee: A Visual Diagnostic and Course Design Tool for Constructive Alignment

Dan Trowsdale; Alison McKay

doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.3

Authors

Dan Trowsdale University of Leeds https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-3575
Alison McKay University of Leeds https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-4759

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.3

Keywords:

curriculum design, design-for-learning, constructive alignment, visual mapping

Abstract

The adoption of digital technologies in higher education offers new opportunities for student learning but also adds complexity to course design and development processes. Although practice varies across institutions and nations, a common response is that teams of people are now involved in the development and creation of blended and online courses. Members of such teams typically include instructional designers, academics, learning designers and technologists, and production teams, and courses are developed over time, often across separate locations and organisations. These factors are creating a need for tools that support the sharing of design information in distributed course design teams. This paper introduces such a course design tool, EdVee, which supports pedagogical innovation through the sharing and visualisation of constructive alignment of learning outcomes, content, learning, and teaching activities and assessment. Key concepts that underpin EdVee are drawn from systems engineering and product development. We demonstrate its value to course design through two case studies: the design of a new course and the evaluation of an existing course.

Click here to read the corresponding ISSOTL blog post.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Dan Trowsdale, University of Leeds

Dan Trowsdale is an experienced product designer and design educator. His research focuses on how visual, play, and design thinking techniques can support the collaboration of design teams during the process of course design.

Alison McKay, University of Leeds

Alison McKay is a mechanical engineer and design educator. Her research brings socio-technical systems perspectives to the design of engineering information systems, design descriptions, and supply chain innovation.

References

Armellini, Alejandro, Gilly Salmon, and David Hawkridge. 2009. “The Carpe Diem Journey: Designing for Learning Transformation.” 135–48. York, UK: Higher Education Academy.

Beetham, Helen, and Rhona Sharpe, eds. 2019. Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Principles and Practices of Design. New York: Routledge.

Bennett, Sue, Shirley Agostinho, and Lori Lockyer. 2017. “The Process of Designing for Learning: Understanding University Teachers’ Design Work.” Educational Technology Research and Development 65 (1): 125–45.

Biggs, John, and Catherine Tang. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw-Hill Education: UK.

Blanchard, Benjamin S., and Wolter J. Fabrycky. 1990. Systems Engineering and Analysis. Vol. 4. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bobbitt, Franklin. 1918. The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Brady, Laurie. 1990. Curriculum Development. Pennsylvania State University: Prentice Hall.

Butcher, Christopher, Clara Davies, and Melissa Highton. 2006. Designing Learning: From Module Outline to Effective Teaching. New York: Routledge.

Cagan, Jonathan M., and Craig M. Vogel. 2002. Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval. Ft Press.

Carvalho, Lucila, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, and Peter Goodyear. 2019. “Instrumental Genesis in the Design Studio.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 14 (1): 77–107.

Clegg, Chris W. 2000. “Sociotechnical Principles for System Design.” Applied Ergonomics 31 (5): 463–77.

Conole, Gráinne. 2019. “Frameworks to Guide Practice.” In Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age, 164–78. New York: Routledge.

Conole, Gráinne, and Karen Fill. 2005. “A Learning Design Toolkit to Create Pedagogically Effective Learning Activities.” Journal of Interactive Media in Education 1.

Dalziel, James. 2015. “Reflections on the Art and Science of Learning Design and the Larnaca Declaration.” In The Art and Science of Learning Design, 3–14. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

Design Council. 2019. “The Double Diamond: A Universally Accepted Depiction of the Design Process.” Accessed November 21, 2022. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/news-opinion/double-diamond-universally-accepted-depiction-design-process/.

Elliott, Chris, and Peter Deasley. 2007. “Creating Systems that Work: Principles of Engineering Systems for the 21st Century.” Royal Academy of Engineering 293074.

Farmer, Robert James, and Julie Usher. 2018. “Why CAIeRO? Perceptions and Impact of Ten Years of CAIeRO at the University of Northampton.”

Farrell, Robert, and Cliff Hooker. 2013. “Design, Science and Wicked Problems.” Design Studies 34 (6): 681–705.

Ferguson, Eugene S. 1992. “The Nature of Engineering Design. Engineering and the Mind’s Eye.” Cambridge: MIT Press.

Frayling, Christopher. 1993. “Research in Art and Design.” Royal College of Art Research Papers 1: 1–5.

Giard, Jacques. 2005. Design FAQs. Dorset Group.

Goodyear, Peter. 2015. “Teaching as Design.” Herdsa Review of Higher Education 2 (2): 27–50.

Goodyear, Peter, and Lucila Carvalho. 2019. “The Analysis of Complex Learning Environments.” In Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age, 49–65. New York: Routledge.

Grundy, Shirley. 1987. “Curriculum: Product or Praxis?” London: Routledge.

IDEO. 2020. “What is Design Thinking?” Accessed July 10, 2020. https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/what-is-design-thinking.

Laurillard, Diana. 2013. Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York: Routledge.

Masterman, Liz. 2019. “The Challenge of Teachers’ Design Practice.” In Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age, 120–33. New York: Routledge.

Matthews, Adam. 2019. “Design as a Discipline for Postdigital Learning and Teaching: Bricolage and Actor-network Theory.” Postdigital Science and Education 1 (2): 413–26.

McKay, Alison, Richard Baker, Richard Chittenden, and Alan de Pennington. 2018. “A Framework for Students to Visualise the Implications of Design Decisions in Global Supply Networks.” In International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Dyson School of Design Engineering: Imperial College, London, UK.

McKay, Alison., Dan B. Trowsdale, Simon A. Carrie, Gerard Duff, and Celia E. Goodburn. 2021. “A Systems Approach for Blended Learning Design”. In Industry Practices, Processes and Techniques Adopted in Education, edited by Kathryn MacCallum and David Parsons, 70-100, Singapore: Springer.

Molenda, Michael. 2015. “In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model.” Performance Improvement 54, (2): 40–42.

Moon, Jennifer. 2003. The Module and Programme Development Handbook: A Practical Guide to Linking Levels, Outcomes and Assessment Criteria. London: Routledge.

Nicholls, Audrey, and Howard Nicholls. (1978) 2018. Developing a Curriculum: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge.

Newell, Catherine, and Alan Bain. 2020. “Academics’ Perceptions of Collaboration in Higher Education Course Design.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (4): 748–63.

Pahl, Gerhard, and Wolfgang Beitz. 2013. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. London: Springer Science & Business Media.

Penin, Lara. 2018. An Introduction to Service Design: Designing the Invisible. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Print, Murray. 1993. “Curriculum Development and Design.” London: Routledge.

Pugh, Stuart. 1991. Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.

Race, Phil. 2014. Making Learning Happen: A Guide for Post-compulsory Education. London: Sage.

Ramsden, Paul. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

Schrage, Michael. 1999. Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. Harvard Business Press.

Schön, Donald A. and Glenn Wiggins. 1992. “Kinds of Seeing and their Functions in designing.” Design Studies 13, (2): 135–56.

Seeto, Deidre, and Panos Vlachopoulos. 2015. “Design Develop Implement (DDI)—A Team-based Approach to Learning Design.” In THETA 2015 Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.

Skilbeck, Malcolm. 1990. School Based Curriculum Development. Sage.

Sommerville, Ian. 2011. “Software Engineering 9th Edition.” Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Stenhouse, Lawrence. 2014. “Defining the Curriculum Problem.” In Curriculum and the Teacher, 25–28. London: Routledge.

Taba, Hilda. 1962. “Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice.” Harcourt Publishers Group.

Tyler, Ralph W. (1949) 2013. “Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction.” In Curriculum Studies Reader E2, 60–68. Routledge.

Ulrich, Karl T., and Steven D. Eppinger. 2004. “Product Architecture.” Product Design and Development 3: 163–86.

Walker, James C. 1992. “A Philosophy of Leadership in Curriculum Development: A Pragmatic and Holistic Approach.” Educative Leadership: 47.

Wheeler, Daryl K. 1974. “Curriculum Concepts and Conceptual Clarity.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 6, (2): 112–19.

Wisdom, James. 2001. “Programme Specifications—What’s the Outcome.” Educational Developments 2: 1–3.

Wiggins, Grant, P., and Jay McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design. ASCD.

Wraga, William G. 2017. “Understanding the Tyler Rationale: Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction in Historical Context.” Espacio, Tiempo y Educación 4 (2): 227–52.

Zundans-Fraser, Lucia. 2014. “Self-organisation in Course Design: A Collaborative, Theory-based Approach to Course Development in Inclusive Education.” PhD diss., Charles Sturt University, Bathurst.