Motivations for Continued Use of Critical Thinking Skills among First-Year Seminar Graduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.9.2.7Keywords:
critical thinking, motivation, first-year undergraduate students, educational psychologyAbstract
Many first-year seminar courses, as well as other programs aimed at first-year undergraduate students, actively incorporate critical thinking into the curriculum. What factors motivate students who purposefully develop these critical thinking skills to continue using them during subsequent semesters? This article discusses results of a study on this topic. Twenty-four students participated in a study approximately one semester after completing a first-year seminar at their university. The study uses mixed methods to (a) discuss students’ self-reported responses regarding nine potential motivating factors for continuing use of critical thinking skills, (b) examine correlations with critical thinking performance on a writing sample, and (c) briefly compare students’ self-reported motivating factors for continued use of critical thinking skills with parallel self-reported motivating factors for continued use of information literacy skills. The article ends with recommendations for applying the findings in the undergraduate classroom.
Metrics
References
Akyildiz, Seçil Tümen. 2019. “Do 21st Century Teachers Know about Heutagogy or Do They Still Adhere to Traditional Pedagogy and Andragogy?” International Journal of Progressive Education 15, no. 6: 151–69.
Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU). "Critical Thinking VALUE Rubric." 2009. https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/critical-thinking.
Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU). "Information Literacy VALUE Rubric." 2013. https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/information-literacy.
Bransford, John, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, (Eds.). 1999. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Decelle, Gina. 2016. “Andragogy: A Fundamental Principle of Online Education for Nursing.” Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity: Education, Research and Policy 9 (2): 1263–73.
Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum, 1985.
Eccles, Jacquelynne S. 1987. “Gender Roles and Women’s Achievement-Related Decisions.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 11: 135–72.
Eccles, Jacquelynne S., and Alan Wigfield. 2002. “Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals.” Annual Review of Psychology 53, no. 1:109–32.
Forrest, Stephen Paul, and Tim O. Peterson. 2006. “It’s Called Andragogy.” Academy of Management Learning and Education 5, no. 1: 113–22.
Giannoukos, Georgios, Georgios Besas, Christos Galiropoulos, and Vasilios Hioctour. 2015. “The Andragogy, the Social Change and the Transformative Learning Educational Approaches in Adult Education.” Journal of Education and Practice 6, no. 10: 46–50.
Hägg, Gustav, and Agnieszka Kurczewska. 2020. “Guiding the Student Entrepreneur – Considering the Emergent Adult within the Pedagogy–Andragogy Continuum in Entrepreneurship Education.” Education + Training 62, no. 7/8: 759–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2020-0069.
Hidi, Suzanne. 2006. “Interest: A Unique Motivational Variable.” Educational Research Review 1, no. 2: 69–82.
Hidi, Suzanne, and William Baird. 1986. “Interestingness—A Neglected Variable in Discourse Processing.” Cognitive Science 10: 179–94.
Justice, Elaine M., and Teresa M. Dornan. 2001. “Metacognitive Differences between Traditional-Age and Nontraditional-Age College Students.” Adult Education Quarterly 51, no. 3: 236–49.
Knowles, Malcolm S. 1978. “Andragogy: Adult Learning Theory in Perspective.” Community College Review 5, no. 3: 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155217800500302.
Kuh, George, Ken O’Donnell, and Carol Geary Schneider. 2017. “HIPs at Ten.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 49, no. 5: 8–16.
Marton, Ference. 2015. Necessary Conditions of Learning. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Engaged Learning: Fostering Success for All Students. Annual Report 2006. National Survey of Student Engagement. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED512619.
Ormrod, Jeanne Ellis. 2012. Human Learning. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Remenick, Lauren, and Lissy Goralnik. 2019. “Applying Andragogy to an Outdoor Science Education Event.” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education 67, no. 1: 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2019.1629804.
Rothes, Ana, Marina S. Lemos, and Teresa Gonçalves. 2017. “Motivational Profiles of Adult Learners.” Adult Education Quarterly 67, no. 1:3–29.
Salomon, Gavriel, and David N. Perkins. 1989. “Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanisms of a Neglected Phenomenon.” Educational Psychologist 24, no. 2: 113–42.
University of Colorado Denver Institutional Research and Effectiveness. 2019. [Data on University of Colorado Denver First-Year Students Enrolled in Fall 2018 Organized Using Tableau Public Software, September 3 2019]. Denver Campus Fall 2018—End of Term. Accessed June 14, 2021. https://www1.ucdenver.edu/offices/institutional-research-and-effectiveness/data-analysis/studentdata/enrollment-and-demographics.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Karen Sobel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
