Students’ Views on the Nature of Science in an Interdisciplinary First-Year Science Program: Content Analysis of a Weekly Reflection Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.10Keywords:
reflections, nature of science, interdisciplinary teaching, first-year science, program evaluationAbstract
A primary aim of science education is to teach students how to interpret and engage with scientific information. To do so effectively requires an adequate understanding of the nature of science (NOS)—in other words, what science is and how it works. There is a long history of evidence to suggest that many undergraduate students struggle to properly understand NOS. While the specific factors contributing to misinformed views on NOS may be difficult to tease apart, the way in which students learn about science at the undergraduate level is a significant contributor. We implemented a reflection activity in a unique first-year program at a large Canadian university in order to promote student learning of NOS. Through the students’ reflections, we identified how certain pedagogical approaches, many of which deviate from traditional teaching methods used throughout undergraduate science education, can positively impact student comprehension of NOS. Our experiences support the use of reflective practices in promoting critical thinking and the development of more nuanced student views of NOS.
Click here to read the corresponding ISSOTL blog post.
Metrics
References
Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad. 2006. “Over and Over Again: College Students’ Views of Nature of Science.” In Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education, edited by Lawrence B. Flick and Norman G. Lederman, 389–425. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_18.
Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad, and Norman G. Lederman. 2000. “The Influence of History of Science Courses on Students’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (10): 1057–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C.
Bautista, Nazan U., and Elisabeth E. Schussler. 2010. “Implementation of an Explicit and Reflective Pedagogy in Introductory Biology Laboratories.” Journal of College Science Teaching 40 (2): 55–61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42993857.
Becheikh, Nizar, Saliha Ziam, Othman Idrissi, Yan Castonguay, and Réjean Landry. 2010. “How to Improve Knowledge Transfer Strategies and Practices in Education? Answers from a Systematic Literature Review.” Research in Higher Education Journal 7: 1–21.
Bell, Gordon, Tony Hey, and Alex Szalay. 2009. “Beyond the Data Deluge.” Science 323 (5919): 1297–98. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170411.
Benbasat, Jülyet A, and Clifton L. Gass. 2002. “Reflections on Integration, Interaction, and Community: The Science One Program and Beyond.” Conservation Ecology 5, (2): 26.
Bezzi, Alfredo. 1999. “What Is This Thing Called Geoscience? Epistemological Dimensions Elicited with the Repertory Grid and Their Implications for Scientific Literacy.” Science Education 83, (6): 675–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<675::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-Q.
Brame, Cynthia J., and Rachel Biel. 2015. “Test-Enhanced Learning: The Potential for Testing to Promote Greater Learning in Undergraduate Science Courses.” CBE Life Sciences Education 14,(2): es4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0208.
Butler, Deborah L., and Philip H. Winne. 1995. “Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–81. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245.
Cook, Elzbieta, Eugene Kennedy, and Saundra Y. McGuire. 2013. “Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Learning Strategies on Performance in General Chemistry Courses.” Journal of Chemical Education 90 (8): 961−67. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300686h.
Davis, Elizabeth A. 2003. “Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (1): 91–142. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_4.
Desaulniers Miller, Marie C., Lisa M. Montplaisir, Erika G. Offerdahl, Fu-Chih Cheng, and Gerald L. Ketterling. 2010. “Comparison of Views of the Nature of Science between Natural Science and Nonscience Majors.” CBE Life Sciences Education 9(1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09-05-0029.
Dounas-Frazer, Dimitri R., and Daniel L. Reinholz. 2015. “Attending to Lifelong Learning Skills Through Guided Reflection in a Physics Class.” American Journal of Physics 83 (10): 881–91. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4930083.
Dryden, Neil, Celeste Leander, Domingo Louis-Martinez, Hiroko Nakahara, Mark MacLean, and Chris Waltham. 2012. “Are We Doing Any Good? A Value-Added Analysis of UBC’s Science One Program.” The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2012.2.4.
Elby, Andrew, and David Hammer. 2001. “On the Substance of a Sophisticated Epistemology.” Science Education 85(5): 554–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1023.
Galili, Igal. 2019. “Towards a Refined Depiction of Nature of Science.” Science & Education 28: 503–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00042-4.
Hodson, Derek, and Siu Ling Wong. 2017. “Going Beyond the Consensus View: Broadening and Enriching the Scope of NOS-Oriented Curricula.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 17 (1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271919.
Hogan, Kathleen. 2000. “Exploring a Process View of Students’ Knowledge about the Nature of Science.” Science Education 84 (1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<51::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-H.
Holmes, Natasha G., Carl E. Wieman, and Douglas A. Bonn. 2015. “Teaching Critical Thinking.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (36): 11199–204. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505329112.
Impey, Chris, Samlyn Buxner, Jesse Antonellis, Elizabeth Johnson, and Courtney King. 2011. “A Twenty-Year Survey of Science Literacy among College Undergraduates.” Journal of College Science Teaching 40 (4): 31–37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ921530.
Karpicke, Jeffrey D., and Henry L. Roediger III. 2008. “The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning.” Science 319 (5865): 966–68. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408.
Karpudewan, Mageswary, Ahmad N. M. Zain, and A.L. Chandrasegaran, A. 2017. “Introduction: Misconceptions in Science Education: An Overview.” In Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions in Science, edited by Margeswary Karpudewan, M., Ahmad N. M. Zain, and A.L. Chandrasegaran, 1–5. Singapore: Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811034350.
Krajcik, Joseph S. and LeeAnn M. Sutherland. 2010. “Supporting Students in Developing Literacy in Science.” Science 328 (5977): 456–59. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182593.
Langdon, Jody, Diana T. Botnaru, Megan Wittenberg, Amy J. Riggs, Jessica Mutchler, Matthew Syno, and Manuela C. Caciula. 2019. “Examining the Effects of Different Teaching Strategies on Metacognition and Academic Performance.” Advances in Physiology Education 43 (3): 414–22. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00013.2018.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lederman, Norman G. 1992. “Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 (4): 331–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404.
Lederman, Norman G. 2007. “Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by Sandra K. Abell and Norman G. Lederman, 831–80. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lederman, Norman G., and Judith S. Lederman. 2014. “Research on Teaching and Learning of Nature of Science.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education Vol II, edited by Sandra K. Abell and Norman G. Lederman, 600–620. New York: Routledge.
Lederman, Norman G., Fouad Abd-El-Khalick, Randy L. Bell, and Renee S. Schwartz. 2002. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034.
Liu, Shianh-Yao, and Chin-Chung Tsao. 2008. “Differences in the Scientific Epistemological Views of Undergraduate Students.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (8): 1055–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701338901.
Matthews, Michael R. 2012. “Changing the Focus: From Nature of Science (NOS) to Features of Science (FOS).” In Advances in Nature of Science Research: Concepts and Methodologies, edited by Myint S. Khine, 3–26. Dordrecht, NL: Springer
McDaniel, Mark A., Janis L. Anderson, Mary H. Derbish, and Nova Morrisette. 2007. “Testing the Testing Effect in the Classroom.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19 (4): 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326154.
Michener, William K., and Matthew B. Jones. 2012. “Ecoinformatics: Supporting Ecology as a Data-Intensive Science.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 85–93. https://10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.016.
National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962.
National Research Council (NRC). 2012. A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
Nufida, Baiq A., Yusran Khey, Suryati, Sru Rahayu, and Endang Budiasih. 2019. “Correlation Amongst Understanding of NOS, Conceptual Understanding, and Science Process Skill of Undergraduate Students on General Chemistry.” AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215: 030024. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0003650.
Osborne, Jonathan, Sue Collins, Mary Ratcliffe, Robin Millar, and Rick Duschl. 2003. “What ‘Ideas-About-Science’ Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (7): 692–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105.
Parker, Joyce M., Charles W. Anderson, Merle Heidemann, John Merrill, Brett Merritt, Gail Richmond, and Mark Urban-Lurain. 2012. “Exploring Undergraduates’ Understanding of Photosynthesis Using Diagnostic Question Clusters.” CBE Life Sciences Education 11, (1): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0054.
Parker, Loran C., Gerald H. Krockover, Sonia Lasher-Trapp, S., and David C. Eichinger. 2008. “Ideas About the Nature of Science Held by Undergraduate Atmospheric Science Students.” American Meteorological Society 89 (11): 1681–88. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2349.1.
Rickey, Dawn, and Angelica M. Stacy. 2000. “The Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry.” Journal of Chemical Education 77 (7): 915–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p915.
Rowe, Matthew P., Marcus B. Gillespie, Kevin R. Harris, Steven D. Koether, Li-Jen Y. Shannon, and Lori A. Rose. 2015. “Redesigning a General Education Science Course to Promote Critical Thinking.” CBE Life Sciences Education 14 (3): ar30. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-02-0032.
Ryder, Jim, John Leach, and Rosalind Driver. 1999. “Undergraduate Science Students’ Images of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(2): 201–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<201::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-H.
Schreier, Margrit. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by Uwe Flick, 170–83. London: SAGE Publications Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n12.
Schussler, Elisabeth, Lisette E. Torres, Stephen Rybczynski, Gary W. Gerald, Emy Monroe, Purbasha Sarkar, Dhan Shahi, and Muna A. Osman. 2008. “Transforming the Teaching of Science Graduate Students Through Reflection.” Journal of College Science Teaching 38 (1): 32–36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40116309.
Siegesmund, Amy. 2016. “Increasing Student Metacognition and Learning Through Classroom-based Learning Communities and Self-Assessment.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 17 (2): 204–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i2.954.
Smith, Mike U., and Lawrence C. Scharmann. 1999. “Defining Versus Describing the Nature of Science: A Pragmatic Analysis for Classroom Teachers and Science Educators.” Science Education 83 (4): 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<493::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-U.
Soicher, Raechel N., and Regan A. R. Gurung. 2017. “Do Exam Wrappers Increase Metacognition and Performance? A Single Course Intervention.” Psychology Learning & Teaching 16(1): 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716661872.
Tala, Suvi, and Veli-Matti Vesterinen. 2015. “Nature of Science Contextualized: Studying Nature of Science with Scientists.” Science & Education (24): 435–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9738-2.
Tanner, Kimberly D. 2012. “Promoting Student Metacognition.” CBE Life Sciences Education 11 (2): 113–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033.
Tripp, Brie, and Erin E. Shortlidge. 2019. “A Framework to Guide Undergraduate Education in Interdisciplinary Science.” CBE Life Sciences Education 18(2): es3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-11-0226.
van Dijk, Esther M. 2011. “Portraying Real Science in Science Communication.” Science Education 95(6): 1086–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20458.
Vhurumuku, Elaosi. 2010. “The Impact of Explicit Instruction on Undergraduate Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science.” African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14(1): 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2010.10740676.
Vosniadou, Stella. 2020. “Students’ Misconceptions and Science Education.” Oxford Encyclopedia of Educational Research. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.965.
Winne, Philip H. 2018. “Cognition and Metacognition Within Self-Regulated Learning.” In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, edited by Dale H. Schunk and Jeffrey A. Greene, 36–48. London,: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048.ch3.
Zeidler, Dana L., Kimberly A. Walker, Wayne A. Ackett, and Michael L. Simmons. 2002. “Tangled Up in Views: Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas.” Science Education 86 (3): 343–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025.
Zembal-Saul, Carla, Phyllis Blumenfeld, and Joseph Krajcik. 2000. “Influence of Guided Cycles of Planning, Teaching, and Reflection on Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Science Content Representations.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(4): 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<318::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-W.
Zhao, Ningfeng, Jeffrey G. Wardeska, Saundra Y. McGuire, and Elzbieta Cook. 2014. “Metacognition: An Effective Tool to Promote Success in College Science Learning.” Journal of College Science Teaching 43(4): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst14_043_04_48.
Zimmerman, Barry J., and Dale H. Schunk. 1989. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nolan N. Bett, Costanza Piccolo, Nathan D. Roberson, A. James Charbonneau, Christopher J. Addison
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
