Policy Implementation in Higher Education: The Dynamics of a Fall Break
Keywords:
policy implementation, fall break, mental health, policy evaluation, higher educationAbstract
A case study using mixed methods that critically appraises the implementation of a mental health policy in higher education in the absence of evidence to inform the policy using an exemplar case from one mid-sized post-secondary institution was the motivation for this research. Explanation building was used to iteratively analyse data on rival explanations of the implementation of the fall break policy. Analyses from the surveys revealed that overall, only 36.9 per cent of students perceived an increase in workload before the break and only 29.6 per cent of students perceived an increase in workload after the break. However, the focus groups and professor interviews revealed that the timing of the fall break had an impact on how students and professors experienced the break and their perceptions on its impact on student mental health. If baseline data regarding the implementation of the fall break would have been collected prior to its implementation, we could have possibly avoided the implementation issues that arose. While this research provides an exemplar case of a fall break policy at one post-secondary institution, the policy learning is universal.
References
Agnew, M., Poole, H., & Khan, A. (2019). Fall break fallout: Exploring student perceptions of the impact of an autumn break on stress. Student Success, 10(3), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i3.1412
Bardach, E. (2012). A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving (4th ed.). Sage.
De Welde, K., & Stepnick, A. (Eds.). (2015). Disrupting the culture of silence: Confronting gender inequality and making change in higher education. Stylus Publishing.
DiPlacito-DeRango, M. M. (2016). Acknowledge the barriers to better the practices: Support for student mental health in higher education. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 7(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2016.2.2
Dollinger, M., & Lodge, J. (2019). Student-staff co-creation in higher education: An evidence-informed model to support future design and implementation. Journal of Higher Education and Policy Management, 42(5), 532-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1663681
Elwood, J. (2013). The role(s) of student voice in 14-19 education policy reform: Reflections on consultation and participation. London Review of Education, 11(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2013.799807
Hands, C., & Freckelton, K. (2019). A perfect storm for leading equity and inclusion: The complexities of policy development, varied student and adult learning needs, and cultures that don’t support them. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 190, 6-17. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjeap/article/view/61765
Hanney, S. R., Gonzalez-Block, M. A., Buxton, M. J., & Kogan, M. (2003). The utilisation of health research in policy-making: Concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems, 1(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-1-2
Heck, E., Jaworska, N., DeSomma, E., Dhoopar, A. S., MacMaster, F., Dewey, D., &MacQueen, G. (2014). A survey of mental health services at post-secondary institutions
in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 59(5), 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F070674371405900504
Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 2, 153-175.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles & policy subsystems (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hulls, C., Rennick, C., Robinson, M., & Mohamed, S. (2018, June 3-6). Effects of a fall reading break on first year students’ course performance in programming [Paper presentation]. Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA-ACEG) Conference, University of British Columbia. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/13006
Klassen, M., & Sá, C. (2020). Do global norms matter? The new logics of engineering accreditation in Canadian universities. Higher Education, 79, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00403-6
Lisnyj, K. T., Russell, R., & Papadopoulos, A. (2020). Risk and protective factors for anxiety and impacting academic performance in post-secondary students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 50(2), 1-94. https://doi.org/10.7202/1071396ar
Martin, M. (2010). Stigma and student mental health in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(3), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903470969
Mavrogordato, M., & White, R. S. (2020). Leveraging policy implementation for social justice: How school leaders shape educational opportunity when implementing policy for English learners. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), 3-45. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013161X18821364
Mowbray, C. T., Mandiberg, J. M., Stein, C. H., Kopels, S., Curlin, C., Megivern, D., Strauss, S., Collins, K., & Lett, R. (2006). Campus mental health services: Recommendations for change. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 226-237. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0002-9432.76.2.226
Nilsen, P., Stahl, C., Roback, K., & Cairney, P. (2013). Never the twain shall meet? A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation. Implementation Science, 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-63
Park, M. M., Lencucha, R., Mattingly, C., Zafran, H., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2015). A qualitative study on the ethics of transforming care: Examining the development and implementation of Canada’s first mental health strategy. Implementation Science, 10, 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0297-y
Pilato, K. A., Law, M. P., Narushima, M., Moore, S. A., & Hay, J. A. (2021a). The creation of a mental health policy in higher education. Educational Policy, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211015613
Pilato, K. A., Law, M. P., Hay, J. A., Narushima, M., & Moore, S. A. (2021b). Stress testing the university fall break policy: Understanding the impact on student mental health [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Canadian Journal of Higher Education.
Poole, H., Khan, A., & Agnew, M. (2018). Stressing in the fall: Effects of a fall break on undergraduate students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 48(3), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.7202/1057133ar
Reale, E., & Seeber, M. (2013). Instruments as empirical evidence for the analysis of higher education policies. Higher Education, 65(1), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9585-5
Scott, P. (2018). Policy process in higher education. In J. C. Shin & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions (pp. 2278–2283). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_151-1
Tanenbaum, S. J. (2005). Evidence-based practice as mental health policy: Three controversies and a caveat. Health Affairs, 24(1), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.163
Timmerman, N., & Metcalfe, A. S. (2009). From policy to pedagogy: The implications of sustainability policy for sustainability pedagogy in higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 39(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v39i1.493
Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2011). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice (5th ed.). Longman/Pearson.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
Zivin, K., Eisenberg, D., Gollust, S. E., & Golberstein, E. (2009). Persistence of mental health problems and needs in college student population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 117, 180-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kelly A. Pilato, Madelyn P. Law, Shannon A. Moore, John A. Hay, Miya Narushima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
