Eleven ways to get a grip on the implementation of remote administration of high-stakes assessments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.73734Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic rushed licensure and certification institutions, as well as many university programs, to integrate Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in their practices to allow for remote administrations of their exams independent of distancing measures. The Black Ice covered in this manuscript is the integration of ICTs to allow remote administration of high-stakes assessments in terms of its development, administration, and monitoring with the aim to promote the validity of score interpretation.
Metrics
References
American Educational Research Association., American Psychological Association., National Council on Measurement in Education., Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2014.
Camara W. Never let a crisis go to waste: large‐scale assessment and the response to COVID‐19. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 2020;39(3):10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12358c
Chilisa B. Towards equity in assessment: crafting gender-fair assessment. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract. 2000;7(1):61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/713613318
Cumming JJ. Legal and educational perspectives of equity in assessment. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract. 2008;15(2):123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940802164168
Wiley A, Buckendahl CW. Your guess is as good as ours. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 2020;39(3):49–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12366
Langenfeld T. Internet‐based proctored assessment: security and fairness issues. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 2020;39(3):24–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12359
Evans J, Knezevich L. Impacts of COVID‐19 on the law school admission test. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 2020;39(3):22–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12367
Joncas SX, St-Onge C, Bourque S, Farand P. Re-using questions in classroom-based assessment: an exploratory study at the undergraduate medical education level. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(6):373–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0482-1
Pugh D, De Champlain A, Gierl M, Lai H, Touchie C. Can automated item generation be used to develop high quality MCQs that assess application of knowledge? Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020;15(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-020-00134-8
Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). Effective assessment in the digital age [Internet]. UK: HEFCE; 2010 Available from: https://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140613220103/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/digiassass_eada.pdf [Accessed Aug 19, 2021].
Sweeney T, West D, Groessler A, et al. Where’s the transformation? Unlocking the potential of technology-enhanced assessment. Teach Learn Inq. 2017;5(1):1–16.
Hewson C. Can online course‐based assessment methods be fair and equitable? Relationships between students’ preferences and performance within online and offline assessments. J Comput Assist Learn. 2012;28(5):488–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00473.x
Hewson C, Charlton J, Brosnan M. Comparing online and offline administration of multiple choice question assessments to psychology undergraduates: do assessment modality or computer attitudes influence performance? Psychol Learn Teach. 2007;6(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.2304%2Fplat.2007.6.1.37
Hewson C, Charlton JP. An investigation of the validity of course-based online assessment methods: the role of computer-related attitudes and assessment mode preferences. J Comput Assist Learn. 2019;35(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12310
St-Onge C, Ouellet K, Lakhal S, Dubé T, Marceau M. COVID-19 as the tipping point for integrating e-assessment in higher education practices. Br J Educ Technol. 2022;53(2):349-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13169
Donn J, Scott JA, Binnie V, Bell A. A pilot of a virtual objective structured clinical examination in dental education. A response to COVID-19. Eur J Dent Educ. 2021;25(3):488–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12624
Lewandowski R, Stratton A, Gupta TS, Cooper M. Twelve tips for OSCE-style Tele-assessment. MedEdPublish. 2020;9. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000168.1
Ryan A, Carson A, Reid K, Smallwood D, Judd T. Fully online OSCEs: a large cohort case study. MedEdPublish. 2020;9. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000214.1
Karim MN, Kaminsky SE, Behrend TS. Cheating, reactions, and performance in remotely proctored testing: an exploratory experimental study. J Bus Psychol. 2014;29(4):555–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9343-z
Lilley M, Meere J, Barker T. Remote live invigilation: a pilot study. J Interact Media Educ. 2016;1(6):1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jime.408
Stowell JR, Bennett D. Effects of online testing on student exam performance and test anxiety. J Educ Comput Res. 2010;42(2):161–171. https://doi.org/10.2190%2FEC.42.2.b
Weiner JA, Hurtz GM. A comparative study of online remote proctored versus onsite proctored high-stakes exams. J Appl Test Technol. 2017;18(1):13–20. Available from: http://jattjournal.net/index.php/atp/article/view/11306 1
Lovett BJ. Extended time testing accommodations for students with disabilities: answers to five fundamental questions. Rev Educ Res. 2010;80(4):611–38. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654310364063
Lovett BJ, Leja AM. ADHD symptoms and benefit from extended time testing accommodations. J Atten Disord. 2015;19(2):167–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713510560
Katsiyannis A, Zhang D, Ryan JB, Jones J. High-stakes testing and students with disabilities: Challenges and promises. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2007;18(3):160–7. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F10442073070180030401
Lin P-Y, Lin Y-C. Examining accommodation effects for equity by overcoming a methodological challenge of sparse data. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;51–52:10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.12.012
Bautista JMD, Manalastas REC. Using video recording in evaluating students’ clinical skills. Med Sci Educ. 2017;27(4):645–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0446-9
Sturpe DA, Huynh D, Haines ST. Scoring Objective structured clinical examinations using video monitors or video recordings. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(3):1–5. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj740344
Kiehl C, Simmenroth-Nayda A, Goerlich Y, et al. Standardized and quality-assured video-recorded examination in undergraduate education: informed consent prior to surgery. J Surg Res. 2014;191(1):64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.01.048
Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Lewis M, Coady D, et al. Exploring the use of videotaped objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of joint examination skills of medical students. Arthritis Care Res. 2007;57(5):869–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22763
Kumar RV. Videotaped OSPE: is this a right procedure to assess health science students’ performance?--A pilot study. Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2016;6(3):211–214. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.686
Driscoll PJ, Paisley AM, Paterson-Brown S. Video assessment of basic surgical trainees’ operative skills. Am J Surg. 2008;196(2):265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.044
Nickel F, Hendrie JD, Stock C, et al. Direct observation versus endoscopic video recording-based rating with the objective structured assessment of technical skills for training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur Surg Res. 2016;57(1–2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444449
Meijer RR, Sijtsma K. Methodology review: evaluating person fit. Appl Psychol Meas. 2001;25(2):107–135. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F01466210122031957
Wood TJ, St-Onge C, Boulais A-P, Blackmore DE, Maguire TO. Identifying the unauthorized use of examination material. Eval Health Prof. 2010;33(1):96–108. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0163278709356192
Iramaneerat C, Yudkowsky R, Myford CM, Downing SM. Quality control of an OSCE using generalizability theory and many-faceted Rasch measurement. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:479–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9060-8
McManus I, Thompson M, Mollon J. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect’) in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-42
Aubin A-S, St-Onge C, Renaud J-S. Detecting rater bias using a person-fit statistic: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(2):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0391-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Christina St-Onge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
