Explorer les perspectives des partie prenantes concernant la mise en œuvre de la formation médicale axée sur les compétences: une étude descriptive qualitative
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.76245Résumé
Introduction: La formation médicale axée sur les compétences (FMAC) offre des avantages et des bénéfices perçus pour les études médicales postdoctorales et la formation de médecins compétents. Le but de notre étude était d’apprendre des personnes impliquées dans l’implantation de la FMAC dans deux programmes de résidence afin d'informer les pratiques de mise en œuvre en cours.
Méthodes: Nous avons réalisé une étude qualitative descriptive pour explorer les perspectives de plusieurs parties prenantes impliquées dans la mise en œuvre de la FMAC dans deux programmes de résidence (la première cohorte) visant à mettre en place le modèle Compétence par conception du Collège royal dans une université canadienne. Des entrevues semi-structurés ont été menés auprès de 17 participants issus de six groupes de parties prenantes, notamment des résidents, des chefs de département, des directeurs de programme, des membres de la faculté, des éducateurs médicaux et des administrateurs de programme. La collecte et l'analyse des données étaient itératives et réflexives afin d’enrichir l'authenticité des résultats.
Résultats: Les perspectives des participants se sont organisées autour de trois thèmes clés, à savoir : a) contextualiser les pratiques de curriculum et d'évaluation avec les objectifs d'apprentissage de la FMAC, b) coordonner les nouvelles exigences administratives pour soutenir la mise en œuvre, et c) s'adapter à une structure de programme axée sur les compétences, chacun avec des sous-thèmes.
Conclusion: En recueillant les perspectives des différents groupes de parties prenantes ayant vécu les processus de mise en œuvre, nous avons développé une compréhension commune des facilitateurs et des défis pour les directeurs de programme, les administrateurs de programme et les leaders éducatifs dans la formation médicale postdoctorale. Les résultats de notre étude contribuent à la conversation savante concernant les aspects clés liés à la mise en œuvre de la FMAC et servent à informer son développement et son application en cours dans différents contextes éducatifs.
Statistiques
Références
Cooke M, Irby DM, O’Brien BC. Educating physicians: a call for reform of medical school and residency. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010.
Frank JR, Mungroo R, Ahmad Y, Wang M, De Rossi S, Horsley T. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: a systematic review of published definitions. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):631-637. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.500898.
ten Cate O. Competency-based postgraduate medical education: past, present and future. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34(5). https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001146.
Caverzagie KL, Nousiainen MT, Ferguson PC, et al. Overarching challenges to the implementation of competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):588-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315075
Nousiainen MT, Caverzagie KJ, Ferguson PC, Frank JR, Collaborators I. Implementing competency-based medical education: what changes in curricular structure and processes are needed? Med Teach. 2017;39(6):594-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315077.
Rachul C, Collins B, Chan MK, Srinivasan G, Hamilton J. Rivalries for attention: insights from a realist evaluation of a postgraduate competency-based medical education implementation in Canada. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):583. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03661-8.
Schultz K, Griffiths J. Implementing competency-based medical education in a postgraduate family medicine residency training program: a stepwise approach, facilitating factors, and processes or steps that would have been helpful. Acad Med. 2016;91(5):685-689. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001066.
Ross S, Binczyk NM, Hamza DM, et al. Association of a competency-based assessment system with identification of and support for medical residents in difficulty. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(7):e184581. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4581.
Danilovich N, Kitto S, Price DW, Campbell C, Hodgson A, Hendry P. Implementing competency-based medical education in family medicine: a narrative review of current trends in assessment. Fam Med. 2021;53(1):9-22. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2021.453158.
Harden RM. Outcome-based education--the ostrich, the peacock and the beaver. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):666-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729948.
Hodges BD, Lingard L. The question of competence: reconsidering medical education in the twenty-first century. Ithaca: ILR Press; 2012.
Dagnone JD, Chan MK, Meschino D, et al. Living in a world of change: bridging the gap from competency-based medical education theory to practice in Canada. Acad Med. 2020;95(11):1643-1646. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003216.
Gruppen L, ten Cate O, Lingard L, Teunissen PW, Kogan JR. Enhanced requirements for assessment in a competency-based, time-variable medical education system. Acad Med. 2018;93:s12-s21. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002066.
Jippes E, Van Luijk SJ, Pols J, Achterkamp MC, Brand PL, Van Engelen JM. Facilitators and barriers to a nationwide implementation of competency-based postgraduate medical curricula: a qualitative study. Med Teach. 2012;34(8):e589-602. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.670325.
Wagner N, Fahim C, Dunn K, Reid D, Sonnadara RR. Otolaryngology residency education: a scoping review on the shift towards competency-based medical education. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(3):564-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12772.
Hawkins RE, Welcher CM, Holmboe ES, et al. Implementation of competency-based medical education: are we addressing the concerns and challenges? Med Educ. 2015;49(11):1086-1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12831.
Brydges R, Boyd VA, Tavares W, et al. Assumptions about competency-based medical education and the state of the underlying evidence: a critical narrative review. Acad Med. 2021;96(2):296-306. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003781.
Boyd VA, Whitehead CR, Thille P, Ginsburg S, Brydges R, Kuper A. Competency-based medical education: the discourse of infallibility. Med Educ. 2018;52(1):45-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13467.
Gruppen L, Frank JR, Lockyer J, et al. Toward a research agenda for competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):623-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315065.
Nousiainen MT, Caverzagie KL, Ferguson KJ, Frank JR. Implementing competency-based medical education: what changes in curricular structure and processes are needed? Med Teach. 2017;39(6):594+598. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315077.
Dagnone D, Stockley D, Flynn L, et al. Delivering on the promise of competency based medical education - an institutional approach. Can Med Ed J. 2019;10(1):e28-e38. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.43303
Stockley D, Egan R, Van Wylick R, et al. A systems approach for institutional CBME adoption at Queen's University. Med Teach. 2020;42(8):916-921. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1767768.
Upadhyaya S, Rashid M, Davila Cervantes A, Oswald A. Exploring resident perceptions of initial competency based medical education implementation. Can Med Ed J. 2021;12(2):e42-e56. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.70943.
Dagnone D, Stockley D, Truelove AH, et al. Building Capacity for CBME Implementation at Queen’s University. MedEdPublish. 2017;6(1). https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2017.000015.
ten Cate O, Snell L, Carraccio C. Medical competence: the interplay between individual ability and the health care environmen. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):669-675. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.500897.
Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review. Res Nurs Health. 2017;40(1):23-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768.
Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing Health Sci. 2013;15(398-405). https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048.
Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qual Nursing Res. 2017;4:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282.
Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description - the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52.
The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Competence by Design launch schedule. https://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/cbd/schedule-status-e. Published 2023.
Patton M, Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE Publications; 2015.
Varpio L, Bell R, Hollingworth G, et al. Is transferring an educational innovation actually a process of transformation? Advances Health Sc Educ. 2012;17(3):357-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9313-4.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ, eds. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological American Psychological Association.; 2012:57-71.
Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis. A practical guide. 1st ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2021. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46
Mann S, Truelove AH, Beesley T, Howden S, Egan R. Resident perceptions of Competency-Based Medical Education. Can Med Educ J. 2020;11(5):e31-e43. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.67958.
Hsu T, De Angelis F, Al-Asaaed S, et al. Ten ways to get a grip on designing and implementing a competency-based medical education training program. Can Med Educ J. 2021;12(2):e81-e87. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.70723.
van Diggele C, Burgess A, Mellis C. Planning, preparing and structuring a small group teaching session. BMC Medical Education. 2020;20(2):462. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02281-4.
Schneiderhan J, Guetterman TC, Dobson ML. Curriculum development: a how to primer. Fam Med Community Health. 2019;7(2):e000046. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000046.
Biggs J. Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education. 2014;1:5-22.
Brauer DG, Ferguson KJ. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Med Teach. 2015;37(4):312-322. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.970998.
Parson R, Danilovich N, Lochnan H, et al. Twelve tips for bringing competencies into continuing professional development: curriculum mapping. MedEdPublish. 2019;8(2). https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2019.000145.1.
Shoemaker BJE. Integrative Education: A Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century. OSSC Bulletin. 1989;33(2).
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924.
Serdyukov P. Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? J Res Innovative Teach Learn. 2017;10(1):4-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
Irby DM, Wilkerson L. Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(5):370-376. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21049.x.
Robin BR, McNeil SG, Cook DA, Agarwal KL, Singhal GR. Preparing for the changing role of instructional technologies in medical education. Acad Med. 2011;86(4):435-439. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dbee4
Sood R, Singh T. Assessment in medical education: evolving perspectives and contemporary trends. Natl Med J India. 2012;25(6):357-364.
Ahmed H, Allaf M, Elghazaly H. COVID-19 and medical education. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20(7):777-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30226-7.
Goh P-S, Sandars J. A vision of the use of technology in medical education after the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish. 2020;9(1). https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000049.1.
Sharma N, Doherty I, Dong C. Adaptive learning in medical education: the final piece of technology enhanced learning? he Ulster medical journal. 2017;86(3):198-200.
Wong EC, Negreanu D, Adreak N, et al. simulation tools in the research and delivery of competency-based medical education and health care: evolving considerations in the contemporary COVID-19 era. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37(3):351-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.10.003.
Hodges AL, Konicki AJ, Talley MH, Bordelon CJ, Holland AC, Galin FS. Competency-based education in transitioning nurse practitioner students from education into practice. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2019;31(11):675-682. https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000327.
Timmerberg JF, Chesbro SB, Jensen GM, Dole RL, Jette DU. Competency-based education and practice in physical therapy: it's time to act! Phys Ther. 2022;102(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzac018.
Van Melle E, Frank JR, Holmboe ES, et al. A core components framework for evaluating implementation of competency-based medical education programs. Acad Med. 2019;94(7):1002-1009. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002743.
Beidas RS, Dorsey S, Lewis CC, et al. Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01226-3.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Tim Dubé, Maryam Wagner, Marco Zaccagnini, Carlos Gomez-Garibello 2023
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
La soumission d’un manuscrit original à la revue constitue une indication qu’il s’agit d’un travail original, qu’il n’a jamais été publié et qu’il n’est pas envisagé pour publication dans une autre revue. S’il est accepté, il sera publié en ligne et ne pourra l’être ailleurs sous la même forme, à des fins commerciales, dans quelque langue que ce soit, sans l’accord de l’éditeur.
La publication d’une recherche scientifique a pour but la diffusion de connaissances et, sous un régime sans but lucratif, ne profite financièrement ni à l’éditeur ni à l’auteur.
Les auteurs qui publient dans la Revue canadienne d’éducation médicale acceptent de publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Paternité - Pas d’utilisation commerciale, Pas de modification 4.0 Canada. Cette licence permet à quiconque de télécharger et de partager l’article à des fins non commerciales, à condition d’en attribuer le crédit aux auteurs. Pour plus de détails sur les droits que les auteurs accordent aux utilisateurs de leur travail, veuillez consulter le résumé de la licence et la licence complète.
