Approaches to Transparency in Arms Control and Verification - A Canadian View of Chinese Perspectives
Abstract
China and Canada represent nearly two opposite ends of a continuum starting with near-total secrecy and ending at near-total transparency in matters of state. Canada advocates transparency, and China opposes it - or at least is extremely cautious in cooperating unless some vital interests are served. China is increasingly drawn into processes of transparency and verification, but the prevailing view is that transparency is only possible between states of equal power; otherwise, the weaker are at a disadvantage in revealing their weakness. It can be argued that Chinese reluctance to increase transparency only fuels suspicions about its intentions. China regards secrecy to be an essential element of statecraft, and will not modify it simply to mollify critics, or to surrender it for access to more sophisticated Western technology. Greater availability of timely and accurate information can have positive benefits for international peace and security, but it is the imbalance between democratic and authoritarian habits of information control that differing notions of transparency emerge. Transparency is not merely a technical problem, but one which derives from the nature of the political system.Downloads
Issue
Section
Articles