Military Coalitions in War and Peace: NATO and the Greek-Turkish Conflict 1952 – 1989

Authors

  • Stefan Brenner Centre for Military History and Social Sciences of the Bundeswehr

Abstract

This is an examination of the way in which the North Atlantic Alliance handled conflicts between members of it against the background of the Cold War and concludes that even though the North Atlantic Alliance is unable to resolve conflicts among its members simply on account of its existence, it has been able to contain them in the long term. This is in part due to a considerable degree on the skill of the NATO Secretary General, on the unity and willingness of the North Atlantic Council, and on high-level military authorities such as SACEUR.

Being an institution, the alliance in addition had the advantage of having bodies like the NATO Council which held permanent sessions or an integrated command structure and was able to use them over a long period to gradually force the two parties to the conflict to be prepared to do something and accept some compromise.

Author Biography

Stefan Brenner, Centre for Military History and Social Sciences of the Bundeswehr

A researcher in the field of "German military history since 1945" at the Centre for Military History and Social Sciences of the Bundeswehr. His research interests include: Colonial history of the German Empire, History of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Germany and history of the armed forces of the GDR, "hot" wars in the Cold War

Downloads

Published

2013-01-29

Issue

Section

Military Strategy in War and Peace