Preventing Domestic Violence in Alberta: A Cost Savings Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v5i0.42386Abstract
Recent studies show that Alberta has the fifth highest rate of police reported intimate partner violence and the second highest rate of self reported spousal violence in Canada, and despite a 2.3 percent decline over the last decade, the province’s rate of self-reported domestic violence has stubbornly remained among the highest in Canada; rates of violence against women alone are 2.3 percentage points higher than the national average. In fact, every hour of every day, a woman in Alberta will undergo some form of interpersonal violence from an ex-partner or ex-spouse. Besides the devastating toll that domestic violence has on victims and their families, the ongoing cost to Albertans is significant. In the past five years alone it is estimated that over $600 million will have been spent on the provision of a few basic health and non health supports and that the majority of this cost ($521 million) is coming out of the pockets of Albertans in the form of tax dollars directed at the provision of services. Fortunately, investment in quality prevention and intervention initiatives can be very cost effective, returning as much as $20 for every dollar invested. Recent research on preventative programming in the context of domestic violence shows promising results in reducing incidents of self-reported domestic violence. The economic analysis of this preventative programming suggests that the benefits of providing the various types of programming outweighed the costs by as much as 6:1. The potential cost savings for the Alberta context are significant; the implementation of these preventative programs has been estimated to be approximately $9.6 million while generating net cost-benefits of over $54 million. Domestic violence is a persistent blight, and continues to have a significant impact on individuals and families in Alberta, but potent tools exist to fight it. This brief paper offers a cogent summary of its costs, and the benefits that could be reaped by investing in quality prevention and intervention programs, making it essential reading for policymakers and anyone else prepared to use them.References
Begg, S., Vos, T., Barker, B., Stevenson, C., Stanley, L., & Lopez, A. D. (2007). The Burden of Disease and Injury in Australia 2003. PHE 82. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. (2011). Family Violence in Canada: A Statistical Profile 2011. Statistics Canada, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics. Catalogue no. 85-224-X Page 16. Table 1.1
Chanely, S., Chanely, J., & Campbell, H. (2001). “Providing refuge: The value of domestic violence shelter services. American Review of Public Administration,” 31: 393-413.
Clark, K., Biddle, A., & Martin, S. (2002). “A cost benefit analysis of the Violence Against Women Act 1994,” Violence Against Women, 8: 417-428.
Corso, P. (2009). “Economic analysis and the prevention of intimate partner violence,” in C. Mitchell & D. Anglin (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: A health-based perspective, (pp. 53-60). Oxford University Press: New York.
Day, T., Mckenna, K., & Bowlus, A. (2005). The Economic Costs of Violence Against Women: An Evaluation of the Literature. Expert brief compiled in preparation for the Secretary-General’s in-depth study on all forms of violence against women. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Day, Tanis. (1995) “The Health Related Costs of Violence Against Women: The Tip of the Iceberg,” first commissioned by the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women, published by The Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Justice Canada. (2009). Family Violence: Department of Justice Canada Overview Paper 2009. Department of Justice Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Online report available at http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/pi/fv-vf/facts-info/fv-vf/fv-vf.pdf.
Domino , M.E., Morrisey, J.P., Chung, S., Huntington, N., Larsen, M.J., & Russell, L. A. (2005). “Service use and costs for women with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders and a history of violence,” Psychiatric Services 56: 1223-1232.
Feder, G., Davies, R.A., Baird, K., Dunne, D., Eldridge, S., Griffiths, C., Gregory, A., Howell, A., Johnson, M., Ramsay, J., Rutherford, C., & Sharp, D. (2011). “Identification and referral to improve safety (IRIS) of women experiencing domestic violence with a primary care training and support programme: A cluster randomized controlled trial,” Lancet, 19;19;378 (9805):1788-95 Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Feder, G., Ramsay, J., Dunne, D., Rose M., Arsene, C., Norman, R., Kuntze, S., Spencer, A., Bacchus, L., Hague, G., Warburton, A., & Taket, A. (2009). “How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health care settings meet criteria for a screening programmme? Systematic reviews on nine U.K,” National Screening Committee criteria. Cochrane data base Review 2009.
Godenzi, A. & Yodanis, C. (2000). “The benefits of studying costs: A review and agenda for studies on the economic costs of violence against women,” Policy Studies, 21(3): 263-276.
Gold, L., Norma, R., Devine, A., Feder G., Taft, A., & Hegarty, K. (2011). “Cost- effectiveness of health care interventions to address intimate partner violence: What do we know and what else should we look for?” Violence against Women, 17: 389-403.
Greaves, L., Hankivsky, O., & Kingston-Riechers, J. (1995). Selected Estimates of Costs of Violence against Women. Centre for Research on Violence against Women and Children, London, Ontario, Canada.
Karoly, L.A., Kilburn, R.M., & Canon J. (2005) Early Childhood Interventions: Proven Results, Future Promise. Retrieved January 2012 from: www.rand.org.
Mihalopoulos, C. 2004. Triple P Positive Parenting Program: Cost effectiveness analysis, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Norman, R., Spencer, A., Eldridge, S. & Feder, G. (2010) “Cost-effectiveness of a programme to detect and provide better care for female victims of intimate partner violence,” Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 15: 143-149.
Nurse Family Partnership (2011). “Benefits and costs: A rigorously tested program with measurable results,” retrieved January 2012 from: www.nursefamilypartnership.org.
Olds, D., Miller, T.R., Knudtson, M., Luckey, D., Bondy, J., Stevenson, A., Holmberg, J., Hanks, C., Kitzman, H., Anson, E., & Arcoleo, K. (2011). Impact of the Nurse-Family Partnership on Neighborhood Context, Government Expenditures, and Children’s School Functioning. National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Rockville, Maryland, U.S.A.
Prevention Action (2011). “Speaking the language of policy,” Prevention Action, October 2011. Retrieved October 31, 2011 from http://www.preventionaction.org.
Ramsay, J., Carter, Y., Davidson, L., Dunne, D., Eldridge, S., Feder, G., Hegarty, K., Rivas, C., Taft, A., & Warburton, A. (2010). “Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychological well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse,” International Journal of Women’s Health 2: 183-197.
Southwest Prevention Center, (2004). Cost benefit of Prevention: Review of the literature. Southwest Prevention Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma.
Taft, A., Small, R., Hegarty, K., Watson, L., Gold, L., & Watson, J. (2011). “MOtherS’ Advocates in the Community (MOSAIC) – non-professional mentor support to reduce intimate partner violence and depression in mothers: A cluster randomized trial in primary care,” BMC Public Health 11:178 accessed from www.biomedcentral.com, January 2012.
Varcoe, O., Hankivsky, M., Ford-Gilboe, J., Wuest, P., Wilk, J., Hammerton, J., and Campbell, J. (2011). “Attributing selected costs to intimate partner violence in a sample of women who have left abusive partners: A social determinants of health approach,” Canadian Public Policy – Analyse de politiques, 37(3): 1-21.
Walby, S. (2004). The Cost of Domestic Violence. Women and Equality Unit, London, U.K.
Walby, S. (2009). The Cost of Domestic Violence: Update 2009. Lancaster University, Lancaster, U.K.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to spppublications@ucalgary.ca. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.
