Catching the Brass Ring: Oil Market Diversification Potential for Canada
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v4i0.42370Résumé
This paper examines the nature and structure of the Canadian oil export market in the context of world prices for heavy crude oil and the potential price differential available to Canadian producers gaining access to new overseas markets. Success in this arena will allow Canada to reap incredible economic benefits. For example, the near term benefits for increased access to Gulf Coast markets after mid-continent bottlenecks are removed, are significant, representing nearly 10$ US per barrel for Canadian producers. On the Pacific Coast, the world market is represented by growing capacity for heavy crude products in emerging Asian markets including Japan, Korea and China and existing heavy crude facilities in California and the west coast. Here, in the reference scenario for California and Asia the benefits are assumed to begin in 2020. The differential value range in California in 2020 is estimated at $7.20US per barrel and escalates to $8.77US by 2030. In Asia, the benefit range is estimated to grow from $11.15US per barrel in 2020 to $13.60US in 2030. Those higher prices for Canadian heavy oil would translate into significant increases in profits, jobs and government revenues. With better access and new pipeline capacity, oil producers will see more efficient access to international markets which can add up to $131 billion to Canada’s GDP between 2016 and 2030 in the reference scenario. This amounts to over $27 billion in federal, provincial and municipal tax receipts, along with an estimated 649,000 person-years of employment. Alberta will be the principal but not sole beneficiary from increased access to world market pricing. Most provinces and territories will realize fiscal and economic gains from the distribution and sale of products reflecting reduced costs and increased access to refineries for heavy oil. The key to this change is the elimination of current bottlenecks in transport and the expansion of a network of pipelines that can move Canadian crude oil to locations reflecting minimal discounts from world market prices. As this paper demonstrates with hard facts and figures, the rewards are too great to ignore.Références
Bacon, Robert, and Silvana Tordo. 2005. “Crude Oil Price Differentials and Differences in Oil Qualities: A Statistical Analysis,” World Bank ESMAP Technical Paper 081.
BP, p.l.c. 2011. BP Statistical Review of World Energy.
Campbell, Robert. 2011, November 16. “COLUMN-Seaway reversal changes Brent-WTI paradigm,” Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/16/column-oil-seawayidUSN1E7AF0I220111116
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. 2011. “Crude Oil Forecast, Markets & Pipelines.” Retrieved from http://www.capp.ca/getdoc.aspx?DocId=190838
Cummins, Chip, and Edward Welsch. 2011, July 8. “Canada Has Plenty of Oil, but Does the U.S. Want It?,” Wall Street Journal (Online). Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303763404576418120173841168.html
Dées, Stéphane, Audrey Gasteuil, Robert K. Kaufmann, and Michael Mann. 2008. “Assessing the Factors Behind Oil Price Changes,” European Central Bank Working Paper Series No 855.
Development Research Center, The State Council. 2003. “China’s National Energy Strategy and Policy 2000-2020.” Retrieved November 10, 2011 from http://www.efchina.org/csepupfiles/report/2006102695218495.5347708042717.pdf/Draft_Natl_E_Plan03 11.pdf
Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines. 2010. “Application for the Northern Gateway Pipeline Project,” Volume 2: Economics, Commercial and Financing Enbridge Northern Gateway Project. Sec. 52 Application.
Energy Resources Conservation Board. 2009. “ST98-2010: Alberta’s Energy Reserves 2009 and Supply/Demand Outlook 2010-2019.” Retrieved November 10, 2011 from http://www.ercb.ca/docs/products/STs/st98_current.pdf
Ensys Energy & Navigistics Consulting. 2010, December 23. “Keystone XL Assessment,” Final Report for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Policy & International Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/clientsite/keystonexl.nsf/AssmtDrftAccpt.pdf
Ensys Energy & Navigistics Consulting. 2011, August 12. “Keystone XL Assessment — No Expansion Update,” Final Report for the U.S. Department of Energy & the U.S. Department of State. Retrieved from http://www.cardnoentrix.com/keystone/xl/feis/FEIS02a_Appendix_V_EnSys_2011.pdf
Fattouh, Bassam. 2010. “The Dynamics of Crude Oil Price Differentials,” Energy Economics, 32: 334342
Gibbons, Robert. 2011, August 22. “Brent crude slips as Libya oil restart eyed,” Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/22/us-markets-oil-idUSTRE77838320110822
Hamilton, James D. 2009. “Understanding Crude Oil Prices,” The Energy Journal, 30(2): 179-206.
Hogan, William W. 1983. “Oil Stockpiling: Help Thy Neighbor,” The Energy Journal, 4 (3):49-71.
Honarvar, Afshin, Dinara Millington, Jon Rozhon, Thorn Walden, and Carlos A. Murillo. 2011. “Economic Impacts of Staged Development of oil Sands Projects in Alberta (2010-2035),” Canadian Energy Research Institute Study No. 125 – Section I
International Energy Agency. 2010. World Energy Outlook 2010.
Mabro, Robert. 2005. “The International Oil Price Regime,” The Journal of Energy Literature, 9(1): 3-20
Mufson, Steven. 2011, November 16. “Pipeline reversal aims to ease glut, boost Gulf access,” The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pipeline-reversalaims-to-ease-glut-boost-gulf-access/2011/11/16/gIQAsqzjSN_story.html
Platts. 2011. Methodology and Specifications Guide to Crude Oil. Retrieved from http://www.platts.com/IM.Platts.Content/methodologyreferences/methodologyspecs/crudeoilspecs.pdf
Purvin & Gertz Inc. 2010. “The Role of WTI as a Crude Oil Benchmark.” Prepared for CME Group. Retrieved from http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/energy/files/PurvinGertz_WTI_Benchmark_Study.pdf
Smith, James L. 2009. “World Oil: Market or Mayhem?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3): 145164.
Trench, Cheryl J (Allegro Energy Group). 2011. “How Pipelines Make the Oil Markets Work — Their Networks, Operation and Regulation,” A Memorandum Prepared for the Association of Oil Pipe Lines And the American Petroleum Institute’s Pipeline Committee. Retrieved from http://www.pipeline101.com/reports/Notes.pdf
Tverberg, G. 2011, February 19. “Why are WTI and Brent Prices so Different?,” Our Finite World. Retrieved from http://ourfiniteworld.com/2011/02/19/why-are-wti-and-brent-prices-so-different/
U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2011. Annual Energy Outlook 2011, DOE/EIA-0383. Retrieved from http://38.96.246.204/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2011).pdf
U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2011, February 28. “WTI-Brent Crude Oil Price Spread Has Reached Unseen Levels.” Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=290
US Energy Information Administration. China Country Analysis Brief. Retrieved November 10, 2011 from http://www.eia.gov/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=CH
US Government Accountability Office, 2007. “Crude Oil: California Crude Oil Price Fluctuations Are Consistent With Broader Market Trends,” GAO-07-315
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to spppublications@ucalgary.ca. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.
