Supply Management: Problems, Politics and Possibilities
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v5i0.42391Résumé
Despite a professed commitment to free trade, Canada has retained a staunchly protectionist supply management regime in several agricultural sectors, notably in the dairy industry. Canada’s dairy farms are governed by a system that prices milk based on intended usage, locks out most foreign products with exorbitantly high tariffs and even determines how much farmers can produce — in other words, a cartel. Everyone suffers. Canadians are forced to pay twice the amount for four litres of whole milk as Americans, while the farmers are barred from taking advantage of the opportunities and efficiencies a truly free market affords. At the same time, Canada’s insistence on protecting supply management makes it difficult for Canada to open up access to international markets. This means that all other Canadian enterprises that rely on trade (including the farmers in the non-supply-managed sectors who make up by far the majority of Canadian farmers) — all those who would benefit from Canadian participation in trade arrangements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, are being denied lucrative access to some of the world’s largest and rapidly growing markets. The system needs to go. However, it is possible to dismantle it fairly. Australia managed it by offering dairy farmers transition payments over eight years, financed by a temporary retail levy on milk, which was still less than what consumers were paying under protection. Consumers now enjoy lower prices and Australia has one of the most dynamic and efficient dairy industries in the world. New Zealand did away with its own tariffs and subsidies even faster, and its dairy sector has become that country’s largest export earner. The potential gains for Canada are very real. At the same time, and, just as importantly, the threats to risk-averse politicians from the dairy lobby are, contrary to widely-held assumptions, negligible. Since 1971, the number of Canadian dairy farms has dropped by a staggering 91 percent. There are now few, if any, ridings where dairy votes could plausibly swing elections — particularly compared to the votes of all those in those same ridings who would benefit from dismantling supply management. This paper assesses Canada’s political, agricultural and economic landscape, highlights the problems with the present regime, challenges long-held political assumptions, and draws on lessons learned from the most successful reforms abroad to make the case for liberalizing the Canadian dairy industry. With lucrative free trade agreements being considered, and in particular the prospect of joining (or being refused access to) the Trans-Pacific Partnership, now is the time for the Harper government to reach out to the provinces and farmers, and move away from supply management for the good of all Canadians.
Références
Alberta Supply Management. “Supply Management: Clear, Consistent and Transparent.” http://albertasupplymanagement.ca/news-and-events/supply-management-clear,-consistent-andtransparent , accessed January — March, 2012
Australian Bureau of Statistics. “The Australian Dairy Industry.” 1301.0 — Year Book Australia, 2004. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Previousproducts/1301.0Feature%20Article182004?opendocum ent&tabname=Summary&prodno=1301.0&issue=2004&num=&view= accessed January — March, 2012
Barichello, R., Cranfield, J., Meilke, K. “Options for Supply Management in Canada with Trade Liberalization.” Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network. June, 2007.
Barnes, P., Courville, I., Lee, P. “Trade Spotlight: Aggressive Action Needed on TPP,” Financial Post, November 8, 2010.
Botterill, L. “The role of agrarian sentiment in Australian rural policy,” in Tracking Rural Change — Community, Policy and Technology in Australia, New Zealand and Europe. 59-78, 2009. http://epress.anu.edu.au/tracking/mobile_devices/index.html accessed January — March, 2012
CAFTA Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance. “Harvesting the WTO Agreement.” March 2008. http://www.cafta.org/Download/cafta_info_package_march_2008.pdf
Cairns, A., Meilke, K. “Price Ceilings on Milk Production Quota Values: Future or Folly?” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 60 (2012) 93-112.
Canada Beef Inc. http://www.canadabeef.ca/index.html, accessed January — March, 2012
Canada Pork Council. “Canada’s Pork Industry.” http://www.cpc-ccp.com/index-e.php, accessed January — March, 2012
Canadian Dairy Commission. http://www.cdc-ccl.gc.ca/CDC/index-eng.php accessed January — March, 2012.
Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association, http://www.crfa.ca , accessed January — March, 2012.
Canadian Vintners’ Association. “Modern History.” http://www.canadianvintners.com/woc/modernhistory.html, accessed March 2012.
Canola Council of Canada. “Canola Facts: An Industry that Depends on Trade.” April 3, 2006 http://www.canolacouncil.org/facts_trade.aspx
Centre for International Economics, Canberra & Sydney. “Benefits of Trade and Liberalisation.” Prepared for Australia Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. May 2009.
Charlebois, S. “With supply management, some cows are more sacred than others.” The Globe and Mail. November 2, 2011.
Courtney, Pip. “Dairy deregulation rolls on despite protests — Deregulation…disaster or new dawn for Australia’s dairy industry?” Landline. June 25, 2000. http://www.abc.net.au/landline/stories/s142422.htm, accessed January — March, 2012
Coyne, A. “The $25,000 cow.” Macleans.ca. August 15, 2011. http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/08/15/the25000-cow/ , accessed January — March, 2012
Dairy Farmers of Canada. “The Economic Impact of the Dairy Industry in Canada.” Prepared by Éco Ressources Consultants. March 2011
Dairy Farmers of Canada. http://www.dairyfarmers.ca/, accessed January — March, 2012.
DairyNZ. Statistics from 2010 World Dairy Summit, http://www.wds2010.com/dairystats.html, accessed January – March, 2012.
DCANZ, Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand. “About NZ Dairy Industry.” http://www.dcanz.com/about-nz-dairy-industry, accessed January — March, 2012.
Edwards, G. “The story of deregulation in the dairy industry.” The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, pp 75-98. 2003.
Egg Farmers of Canada. http://www.eggs.ca, accessed January — March, 2012
Elections Canada. http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=ele&dir=pas&document=index&lang=e
Fox, Andrea. “Milk price regulation would be collective suicide.” Fairfax NZ News. Blog, April 17, 2011. http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/4897252/Milk-price-regulation-would-be-collective-suicide
Frontier Centre for Public Policy. “Reforming Milk the Australian Way.” Fax from the Frontier, March 13, 2003. http://www.fcpp.org/pdf/ff216%20Australia%20shows%20the%20way%20in%20dairy%20reform.pdf
Gifford, M. “Golden Opportunities and Surmountable Challenges: Prospects for Canadian Agriculture in Asia.” Canadian Council of Chief Executives. April, 2012.
GO5 Coalition for a Fair Farming Model. “Supply Management.” 2008.http://www.go5quebec.ca/en/ accessed January — March, 2012
Goldfarb, D. “Making Milk: The Practices, Players, and Pressures Behind Dairy Supply Management.” The Conference Board of Canada. November, 2009.
Gordon, S. “Favouring producers over consumers is a road to ruin.” Globe and Mail blog, November 29, 2011. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/stephengordon/favouring-producers-over-consumers-is-a-road-to-ruin/article2253118/
Gould, B. “Understanding Dairy Markets.” Agricultural and Applied Economics, UW Madison http://future.aae.wisc.edu/data/monthly_values/by_area/10?area=US&grid=true&tab=prices
Government of Australia. “Advancing Agriculture Reform in the EU and Australia.” Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade; Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. 2008.
Government of Canada. “2006 Census of Agriculture. Reference Maps.” Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/ca-ra2006/reference_map-carte-eng.htm#nfl%0A
Government of Canada. “CANSIM tables for Agriculture.” Statistics Canada. http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a29?lang=eng&groupid=001&p2=17#n2
Government of Canada. “Consumer price indexes. Food and other selected items, average retail prices.” Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/econ155a-eng.htm
Government of Canada. Statistics Canada, CANSIM tables v41690973 and v53385220.
Government of Canada. “Dairy Cows by Province on January 1st (1993 - 2011).” Statistics Canada, Table 003-0032. Canadian Dairy Information Centre. http://www.dairyinfo.gc.ca/index_e.php?s1=dfffcil&s2=farm-ferme&s3=nb&page=dcvl
Government of Canada. “Dairy Facts and Figures.” Canadian Dairy Information Centre. http://www.dairyinfo.gc.ca/index_e.php?s1=dff-fcil
Government of Canada. “Farm data and farm operator data tables. Farm Type (North American Industry Classification System).” Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/95-629-x/2007000/4123852eng.htm
Government of Canada. “Farm data and farm operator data tables. Livestock, poultry and bees.” Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/95-629-x/2007000/4123855-eng.htm
Government of Canada. “Farm operators by farm type and province (2001 and 2006).” Statistics Canada, http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/cst01/agrc22a-eng.htm
Government of Canada. “Next Generation of Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy.” Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, 2006. http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/displayafficher.do?id=1201185700444&lang=eng
Government of Canada. “Poultry, ... at a glance.” Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: Poultry Marketplace. http://www.agr.gc.ca/poultry-volaille/glpl_eng.htm
Government of Canada. “Statistics on Income of Farm Operators.” Statistics Canada http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/21-206-x/2012000/tablesectlist-listetableauxsect-eng.htm
Government of Canada. “Stucture of the Canadian Egg Industry.” Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada: Poultry Marketplace, Profile of The Canadian Egg Industry, Chapter 3. http://www.agr.gc.ca/poultry/prinde3_eng.htm#sec35
Government of Canada. “The Atlas of Canada — Dairy Cows by Census Division, 1996.” Natural Resources Canada. http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/economic/agriculture/agriculture1996/dairycattlebycd1996/1
Government of Canada. “The Canadian Dairy Industry at a Glance.” Canadian Dairy Information Centre. http://www.dairyinfo.gc.ca/index_e.php?s1=cdi-ilc
Government of Canada. “The Dairy Review.” Statistics Canada .April-June 2006. Catalogue no. 23-001XIB
Government of Canada. “Trade.” Canadian Dairy Commission. http://www.cdc-ccl.gc.ca/CDC/indexeng.php?id=3803
Government of Canada. ”Number of Farms with Shipments of Milk or Cream on August 1st (1993 – 2011).” Canadian Dairy Information Centre. http://www.dairyinfo.gc.ca/index_e.php?s1=dfffcil&s2=farm-ferme&s3=nb&page=farm_ferme
Government of Canada. Farms classified by industry (North American Industry Classification System), Table 3.2-1; Dairy cattle and milk production and Beef cattle ranching and farming, including feedlots, census years 2006 and 2001, Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/95-629-x/3/4182432eng.htm
Government of Canada. Farms classified by industry group (North American Industry Classification System), Table 3.1-1; Cattle ranching and farming and Hog and pig farming, census years 2006 and 2001, Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/95-629-x/3/4182418-eng.htm
Government of Canada. Farms classified by industry group (North American Industry Classification System), Table 3.1-3; Other animal production and oilseed and grain farming, census years 2006 and 2001, Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/95-629-x/3/4123865-eng.htm
Government of New Zealand. “Dairy.” Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. http://www.maf.govt.nz/agriculture/pastoral/dairy
Government of New Zealand. “The Dairy Industry Restructuring Act — The Dairy Industry Restructuring Act 2001 (DIR) provides for the regulatory and structural reform of the dairy industry.” Commerce Commission New Zealand. http://www.comcom.govt.nz/the-dairy-industry-restructuring-act/ accessed January — March, 2012.
Hart, M. “Great Wine, Better Cheese: How Canada can Escape the Trap of Agricultural Supply Management.” C. D. Howe Institute, Vol. 90. 2005.
Harris, David. "Producer adjustment to policy reform: A case study on the Australian dairy industry" Paper prepared for the 48th annual conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society. D.N. Harris & Associates. Feb 2004 http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/58456/2/2004_harris.pdf
Holden, M. “Canada’s Domestic Agricultural Supports and the World Trade Organization.” Parliamentary Information and Research Service, Library of Parliament. September 20, 2005.
Institute for Competitiveness & Prosperity. “The poor still pay more: Challenges low income families face in consuming a nutritious diet.” December 21, 2010. http://www.competeprosper.ca/index.php/media/press_releases/the_poor_still_pay_more/
International Dairy Foods Association. “An International Comparison of Milk Supply Control Programs and Their Impacts.” (Informa Economics, Inc.) September, 2010.
Ivison, John. “Bread and Butter Issues a Delicate Dance: Don’t Expect Tory Plan to End Wheat Board Monopoly to Extend to Dairy Price Support.” National Post. October 19, 2006.
Lee, I. “The Milking of Canadians.” The Star, November 21, 2011.
Lippert, O. “The Perfect Food in a Perfect Mess: The Cost of Milk in Canada.” The Fraser Institute — Public Policy Sources, Number 52. November 2001.
Mandel-Campbell, A. “The Milk of Human Avarice.” Maclean’s. January 16, 2006 http://www.macleans.ca/business/companies/article.jsp?content=20060116_119652_119652
Martin, L. (George Morris Centre). “2009 Agricultural Outlook,” prepared for BDO Dunwoody LLP. Dec 2, 2008. http://www.bdo.ca/library/publications/agriculture/documents/BDODunwoodyOutlookFinal_000.pdf
Martin, Larry. “Supply management marketing boards could do with some reform.” Guelph Mercury. November 29, 2011. http://www.guelphmercury.com/opinion/columns/article/631540—supplymanagement-marketing-boards-could-do-with-some-reform
Merkel, R. “Dairy deregulation.” Blog. January 4, 2010. http://larvatusprodeo.net/archives/2010/01/04/dairy-deregulation/
Montreal Economic Institute. “Reforming dairy supply management in Canada: the Australian experience.” January, 2006.
Montreal Economic Institute. “Dairy Production: the costs of supply management in Canada.” February, 2005.
Mussell, A., Asfaha, T. “Canadian Agricultural Policy in the International Context,” paper 10 of Advancing a Policy Dialogue — A series of papers prepared for the Canadian Agri-Food Policy Institute (the George Morris Centre) pp 44-53. February, 2011.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). “Economic Survey of Canada 2008.” June, 2008. http://www.oecd.org/document/3/0,3343,en_2649_201185_40732867_1_1_1_1,00.html
Painter, M. “A Comparison of the Dairy Industries in Canada and New Zealand.” Journal of International Farm Management Vol.4 No.1 — June 2007.
Paul, E. “Australia’s Dairy Reforms — Lessons for Canada.” The Frontier Centre for Public Policy. March, 2003. http://www.fcpp.org/pdf/PS_16_Australia_Dairy_Reform_Lessons_for_Canada_March_2003.pdf
Petkantchin, V. “How Australia got out of supply management – A lesson for Canada: Milk prices fell from 18% to 29%.” National Post, February 8, 2006 p. FP-23.
Pulse Canada. “Pulse Industry.” http://www.pulsecanada.com/pulse-industry
Rude, J., Meilke, K.. “Canadian Agriculture and the Doha Development Agenda: The Challenges.” The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 7.1 (2006): 32-48. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/23825/1/07010032.pdf
Sayre, L. “Farming without subsidies? Some lessons from New Zealand.” Rodale Institute. March, 2003. http://newfarm.rodaleinstitute.org/features/0303/newzealand_subsidies.shtml
Scullion, E. The Canadian Dairy Commission. A 40-year restrospective. Ottawa: Canadian Dairy Commission. 2006.
Simpson, J. “Fear Trumps Reason in the Politics of Agriculture.” The Globe and Mail. July 26, 2006.
The Frontier Centre for Public Policy. “Reforming Milk the Australian Way.” March 13, 2003.
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service — Retail Milk Prices. http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateL&navID=IndustryM arketingandPromotion&leftNav=IndustryMarketingandPromotion&page=RetailPrices&description=Milk +Marketing+Order+Statistics&acct=dmktord
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index — Average Price Data. “US city average. http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics for US Milk Prices http://future.aae.wisc.edu/data/monthly_values/by_area/312?area=US and CPI All Items ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/cpi/cpiai.txt
Watson, W. “Milking our gullibility.” Financial Post. October 26, 2011. http://opinion.financialpost.com/2011/10/26/william-watson-milking-our-gullibility/
Watson, W. “The subsidy harvest.” Financial Post. November 17, 2011.
Woldring, R. “Supply Management is a Canadian Success Story For Consumers and Producers — An International Model for Doing Agriculture the Right Way.” Press Release, Chicken Farmers of Ontario. March 19, 2007.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to spppublications@ucalgary.ca. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.