The Security Dimension of a China Free Trade Agreement Balancing Benefits and Risk – The Security Dilemma
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v11i0.43149Résumé
In 2017, Canada engaged in several rounds of exploratory discussions for a potential free
trade agreement (FTA) with the People’s Republic of China. It seemed probable that this
exploratory phase would be followed by the opening of formal rounds of negotiations, to
be announced during Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s visit to China in December 2017. An FTA appeared to be a priority for Trudeau since his government came into office in
2015 (Global Affairs Canada, 2017a; Lu, 2017; PMO, 2017); however, such negotiations were put on hold indefinitely, ostensibly due to irreconcilable differences on gender and labour issues.
Despite this setback, it is likely that the Canadian government will
continue to explore this option in the coming years, particularly with the North American Free Rade agreement (NAFTA) in jeopardy. While there are many potential benefits of a Canada-China free trade agreement (CCFTA), there are also significant national security implications that will deserve particular attention. The security dimension will
be the focus of this paper.
Prospective CCFTA negotiations with China would be both complex and time
consuming, in part due to the wide divergences between the Canadian and Chinese
economies, as well as differences between Canadian and Chinese administrative
and legal systems. Negotiations could therefore take several years to conclude, and
might not be finished until well after the 2019 federal election. It took a full decade
to sign and ratify the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA), although it
appears that the most difficult portion of the negotiations was wrapped up in the final two years.
It is unlikely that a CCFTA will move as slowly as the Australian FTA did, in part because of
the established Australian precedent and because of China’s increasing familiarity with FTA
negotiations that involve advanced economies. For this reason, Canada would benefit from
approaching a CCFTA after Australia, but before many other Western countries.
Chinese and Canadian negotiators will be consumed with elaborating the principles of each side’s
responsive FTA approaches, as well as the myriad of details involving thousands of products and
services that a CCFTA’s provisions would affect. Canadian negotiators will seek a high-quality
FTA that covers a large percentage of our export and import products with China, as well as an
agreement that covers all key sectors and industries. There is also likely to be a Canadian focus on
addressing China’s use of non-tariff barriers to trade which currently inhibit Canadian firms from
taking full advantage of the massive China market. Such measures include the Chinese Ministry
of Health’s 2013 changes to food safety standards which required all imported food products to list
detailed nutritional components in Chinese. Procedural barriers such as this represent a significant
hurdle for Canadian firms, and cause uncertainty among international exporters that want to break
into the Chinese domestic market. In theory, the centralized Chinese economy lacks the regional
complexity of the Canadian federal state, characterized by sub-national units, but in reality, China’s
provinces and municipalities can, and often do, impose barriers to foreign imports, often to protect
market share for local substantive industries.
To date, China has FTAs with only a handful of developed countries. Australia, Korea, Switzerland,
Iceland, Singapore and New Zealand currently have bilateral FTAs with China, and several others,
such as Norway and Israel, are in FTA negotiations. China is also floating ideas for FTAs with
developing countries, including India. China is far more trade-dependent than the United States,
although by comparison China is not nearly as trade-dependent as Canada is.1 The balance of trade
is currently in China’s favour: China exports US$46 billion to Canada, versus the US$16 billion
that it imports from Canada (MIT, 2016a). However, it is important to note that China’s exports
to Canada account for only 2.2 per cent of China’s total merchandise exports (MIT, 2016b).
Téléchargements
Fichiers supplémentaires
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
The following is the copyright statement of SPPP.
Copyright © <Author name> <year>. This is an open-access paper distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows non-commercial sharing and redistribution so long as the original author and publisher are credited.
Publication Copyright and Licensing
The following guidelines and information, provided in six sections, are intended for authors (the “Author”) who are invited to write a paper (the “Work”) for The School of Public Policy Publications (the “Publisher”). The rights and responsibilities conveyed in the SPP Author Agreement will only apply once your paper is accepted for publication. At that point in the publication process, you will be asked to download the form and return a signed copy via e-mail to spppublications@ucalgary.ca. Please review the below information to ensure agreement with SPPP policies.
Section 1: Author’s Grant of Rights
In consideration of the Publisher’s agreeing to publish the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications, the Author hereby grants to the Publisher the following:
1.1 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to publish, reproduce, publicly display, publicly perform and distribute the Work in perpetuity throughout the world in all means of expression by any method or media now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format;
1.2 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to use the Author’s name and likeness in association with the Work in published form and in advertising and promotional materials related to the Work; and
1.3 The irrevocable, royalty-free right to license others to do any or all of the above.
Section 2: Prior Publication & Publication by Others
2.1 The Author agrees not to publish the Work, or authorize any third party to publish the Work, either in print or electronically, prior to publication of the Work by the Publisher.
2.2 The Author agrees not to publish the Work in any publication outlet which is substantially similar to The School of Public Policy Publications for a period of six (6) months after publication of the Work in The School of Public Policy Publications. Substantially similar is defined as a non-subscription, open-access publication outlet with a similar mandate/vision and intended audience.
2.3 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to contact The School of Public Policy Publications to inform them of the subsequent publication.
2.4 Should the Author publish or distribute the Work elsewhere at any time or in any alternate format, the Author agrees to make reasonable efforts to ensure that any such additional publication cites the publication in The School of Public Policy Publications by author, title, and publisher, through a tagline, author bibliography, or similar means. A sample acknowledgement would be:
“Reprinted with permission from the author. Originally published in the The School of Public Policy Publications, http://www.policyschool.ca/publications/.”
Section 3: Editing and Formatting
The Author authorizes the Publisher to edit the Work and to make such modifications as are technically necessary or desirable to exercise the rights in Section 1 in differing media and formats. The Publisher will make no material modification to the content of the Work without the Author’s consent.
Section 4: Author’s Ownership of Copyright and Reservation of Rights
4.1 Nothing in this agreement constitutes a transfer of the copyright by the Author, and the copyright in the Work is subject to the rights granted by this agreement.
4.2 The Author retains the following rights, including but not limited to, the right:
4.2.1 To reproduce and distribute the Work, and to authorize others to reproduce and distribute the Work, in any format;
4.2.2 To post a version of the Work in an institutional repository or the Author’s personal or departmental web page so long as The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.2.3 To include the Work, in whole or in part, in another work, subject to Section 2 above and provided that The School of Public Policy Publications is cited as the source of first publication of the Work (see sample acknowledgement above).
4.3 The Editors and Editorial Board of The School of Public Policy Publications requires authors to publish the Work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the Work for noncommercial purposes, and ensures the Author is credited for the original creation. This onward licensing is subject to section 2.4 of this agreement, which further ensures that the original publisher is credited.
Section 5: Author’s Warranties and Undertakings
The Author warrants that:
5.1 The Author is the sole author of the Work, or if a joint author, the Author has identified within the Work the other authors, and holds the copyright, either solely or jointly, and has the power to convey the rights granted in this agreement.
5.2 The Work has not previously been published, in whole or in part, except as follows:
5.3 Any textual, graphic or multimedia material included in the Work that is the property or work of another is either explicitly identified by source and cited in the Work or is otherwise identified as follows:
5.4 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not contain matter that is obscene, libelous, or defamatory; it does not violate another’s civil right, right of privacy, right of publicity, or other legal right; and it is otherwise not unlawful.
5.5 To the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not infringe the copyright or other intellectual property or literary rights of another.
5.6 The Author will indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss, damages, expenses, awards, and judgments arising from breach of any such warranties.
Section 6: The Reuse of Third-Party Works
The Publisher requires that the Author determine, prior to publication, whether it is necessary to obtain permissions from any third party who holds rights with respect to any photographs, illustrations, drawings, text, or any other material (“third-party work”) to be published with or in connection with your Work. Copyright permission will not be necessary if the use is determined to be fair dealing, if the work is in the public domain, or if the rights-holder has granted a Creative Commons or other licence. If either the Author or Publisher determines for any reason that permission is required to include any thirdparty work, the Author will obtain written permission from the rightsholder.
