Developing SoTL through organized scholarship institutes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.19Keywords:
institutional integration, SoTL institutes, community, interdisciplinarity, professional development for SoTLAbstract
The need to further integrate SoTL into college and university cultures has been discussed relatively frequently in recent teaching and learning literature. While a number of useful strategies to assist in this task have been advanced, one especially promising suggestion is the development of organized, institutionally-recognized scholarship institutes. Centres or units of this sort have been created at higher education institutions in a number of countries, but little published information currently exists about the design of these institutes or the experiences of individuals affiliated with them. To that end, the present study sought to examine the perceived benefits, challenges and design features of teaching and learning scholarship institutes at research-intensive universities worldwide. A website scan and a survey of individuals affiliated with these units were used to collect qualitative and quantitative data of relevance to the research questions. Based on the findings, and on ideas from the existing research institute and scholarship of teaching and learning literatures, a series of recommendations for individuals and campuses interested in developing effective SoTL institutes are provided.
Metrics
References
Åkerlind, G.S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17-31.
Becker, W.E. (2008). An unrealized vision for SoTL. International Commons, 3(1), 10-11.
Boardman, C., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Role strain in university research centers. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(4), 430–463.
Boardman, C., & Corley, E.A. (2008). University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 37(5), 900–913.
Boshier, R. (2009). Why is the scholarship of teaching and learning such a hard sell? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 1–15.
Brew, A. (2010). Transforming academic practice through scholarship. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 105–116.
Chalmers, D. (2011). Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the scholarship of teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 25–38.
Cousin, G., Healey, M., Jenkins, A., Bradbeer, J., & King, H. (2003). Raising educational research capacity: A discipline-based approach. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice - 10 years on. Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University. Retrieved from www2.glos.ac.uk/gdn/confpubl/cousinetal.doc
Dewar, J. M., & Bennett, C. (2010). Situating SoTL within the disciplines: Mathematics in the United States as a case study. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ijSoTL/vol4/iss1/14/
Donnermeyer, J.F., Kalish, A., & Johnson, T. (2009). Many are called, but few show up: Building scholarly communities of teachers. Transformative Dialogues, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.kpu.ca/td/past-issues/3-1
Dunwoody, P.T., Westcott, K., Drews, D., & Hosler, J. (2012). Case study of a shoe-string SoTL center. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol6/iss1/21/
Fanghanel, J. (2013). Going public with pedagogical inquiries: SoTL as a methodology for faculty professional development. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 59–70.
Felten, P. (2013). Principles of good practice in SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 121–125.
Forward with Integrity Advisory Group (2012). Forward with integrity: The emerging landscape. Retrieved from http://www.mcmaster.ca/presidentsoffice/priorities/ag_report.html
Gale, R. (2009). Scholarship in support of institutional change . . . Institutional change in support of scholarship. MountainRise, 5(3). Retrieved from http://mountainrise.wcu.edu/index.php/MtnRise/article/view/128/95
Galloway, K., & Jones, P. (2012). Scholarship in the discipline and higher education: The need for a fusion epistemology focused on academic identity. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 931–933.
Ginsberg, S.M., & Bernstein, J.L. (2011). Growing the scholarship of teaching and learning through institutional culture change. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 1–12. Retrieved from http://joSoTL.indiana.edu/issue/view/166
Goodburn, A., & Savory, P. (2009). Integrating SoTL into instructional and institutional processes. MountainRise, 5(3). Retrieved from http://mountainrise.wcu.edu/index.php/MtnRise/ article/view/131/98
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York, England: HE Academy. Retrieved from: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/engagement-through-partnership-students-partners-learning-and-teaching-higher-education.
Hoon, C.H., & Looker, P. (2013). On the margins of SoTL discourse: An Asian perspective. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 131-145.
Hubball, H., Clarke, A., & Poole, G. (2010). Ten-year reflections on mentoring SoTL research in a research-intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 117–129.
Huber, M.T. (2013). Foreword. In K. McKinney (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines (pp. ix–xiv). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Huber, M.T., & Morreale, S.P. (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Ciccone, A. (2011). Getting there: An integrative vision of the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol5/iss1/31/
MacKenzie, J., & Mann, S. (2009). Changing academic practice at a UK research-intensive university through supporting the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). Transformative Dialogues, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.kpu.ca/td/past-issues/3-1
MacKenzie, J., & Meyers, R.A. (2012). International collaboration in SoTL: Current status and future direction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol6/iss1/4/
Marquis, E., Healey, M., & Vine, M. (2014). Building capacity for the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) using international collaborative writing groups. The International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 8(1). Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol8/iss1/12/
Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011). Developing a quality culture through the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 51–62.
McConnell, C. (2012). Developing a SoTL campus initiative: Reflections on creating sustainable impact. Transformative Dialogues, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.kpu.ca/td/past-issues/6-2
McKinney, K. (2012). Making a difference: Application of SoTL to enhance learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 1–7. Retrieved from http://joSoTL.indiana.edu/issue/view/177
McKinney, K. (Ed.). (2013). The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
McKinney, K., & Jarvis, P. (2009). Beyond lines on the CV: Faculty applications of their scholarship of teaching and learning research. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol3/iss1/7/
Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Meta Robinson, J., Gresalfi, M., Sievert, A.K., Dowell Kearns, K., Booth Christensen, T., & Zolan, M.E. (2013). Talking across the disciplines: Building communicative competence in a multidisciplinary graduate-student seminar on inquiry in teaching and learning. In K. McKinney (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines (pp. 186–199). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Mighty, J. (2013). One important lesson I’ve learned from my involvement with SoTL. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 113–116.
Patel, F. (2014). Promoting a culture of scholarship among educational developers: Exploring institutional opportunities. International Journal for Academic Development, 19(3), 242-254.
Poole, G. (2013). Square one: What is research? In K. McKinney (Ed.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines (pp. 135–151). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Poole, G., Taylor, L., & Thompson, J. (2007). Using the scholarship of teaching and learning at disciplinary, national and institutional levels to strategically improve the quality of post-secondary education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(2). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol1/iss2/3/
Richlin, L., & Cox, M. D. (2004). Developing scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning through faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2004(97), 127–135.
Sá, C. M. (2007). “Interdisciplinary strategies” in U.S. research universities. Higher Education, 55(5), 537–552.
Sá, C. M., & Oleksiyenko, A. (2011). Between the local and the global: Organized research units and international collaborations in the health sciences. Higher Education, 62(3), 367–382.
Schroeder, C. M. (2007). Countering SoTL marginalization: A model for integrating SoTL with institutional initiatives. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol1/iss1/15/
Shulman, L. S. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning: A personal account and reflection. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol5/iss1/30/
Simmons, N., Abrahamson, E., Deshler, J.M., Kensington-Miller, B., Manarin, K., Morón-García, S., Oliver, C., & Renc-Roe, J. (2013). Conflicts and configurations in a liminal space: SoTL scholars’ identity development. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(2): 9-21.
Tremonte, C. M. (2011). Window shopping: Fashioning a scholarship of interdisciplinary teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-SoTL/vol5/iss1/26/
Walker, J.D., Baepler, P., & Cohen, B. (2008). The scholarship of teaching and learning paradox. Results without rewards. College Teaching, 56(3), 183–189.
Williams, A.L., Verwoord, R., Beery, T.A., Dalton, H., McKinnon, J., Strickland, K., Pace, J., & Poole, G. (2013). The power of social networks: A model for weaving the scholarship of teaching and learning into institutional culture. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(2), 49-62.
