Graduates’ orientations to Higher Education and their retrospective experiences of teaching and learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.3.2.55Keywords:
graduate, millenials, orientation, curriculum, experiences, higher educationAbstract
In this article, we sought a relation between orientation to higher education and curricular experiences, and elucidated the nature of transformative curricular experiences. Twenty-four graduates from humanities and science degrees in the year 2000 were interviewed approximately five years later to obtain their retrospective views on the purpose of higher education, as well as their undergraduate experiences of teaching and learning. Drawing on phenomenographic principles, four orientations to higher education were generated. Four participant cases are analyzed, representing each orientation to higher education. In the ‘gaining a qualification’ orientation, graduates valued being told what to learn, as well as learning practical skills. For the ‘preparation for a job’ orientation, graduates wanted lecturers who were good at conveying information, but they also valued project work, having some autonomy over learning and practical applications. In the ‘developing skills and learning how to think’ orientation, graduates valued being challenged and learning in groups, but also wanted to learn professional skills. In the ‘growing as an individual’ orientation, graduates valued being challenged, gaining different perspectives, developing critical thinking, learning about theory, interacting with lecturers, research, and study for its own sake. Some curricular experiences transformed thinking about the purpose of higher education, including learning through discussion in small groups, authentic learning tasks including inquiry-based assignments, exercises in developing critical thinking, opportunities to interact with teachers, opportunities to develop practical skills, experiencing different cultures and personal growth through lifestyle and social experiences. Our research has implications for advising students, as well as for teachers aiming to encourage a deep approach to learning.
Metrics
References
Beaty, E., Gibbs, G., & Morgan, A. (1997). Learning orientations and study contracts. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwsitle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (pp.72-86). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd Ed.). Berkshire, England: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Buissink-Smith, N., Spronken-Smith, R.A., & Grigg, G. (2008). Understanding the millennial generation. Can the literature go Down Under? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 43(1), 127-145.
Clark, B.R., & Trow, M. (1966). The organizational context. In T.M. Newcomb & E.K. Wilson (Eds.), College peer groups. Problems and prospects for research (pp. 17-70). Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university. Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Entwistle, N.J., & Petersen, E.R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 407-428.
Gibbs, G., Morgan, A., & Taylor, E. (1984). The world of the learner. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 165-188). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next generation. New York, NY: Vintage.
Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277-300.
McCune, V. (2009). Final year biosciences students’ willingness to engage: Teaching-learning environments, authentic learning experiences and identities. Studies in Higher Education, 34(3), 347-361.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. The experience in higher education. Berkshire, England: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London, England: Routledge/Falmer.
Schwartz, H. (1994). Small states in big trouble. State reorganisation in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand and Sweden in the 1980s. World Politics, 46, 527-555.
Shulman, L.S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, Summer, 52-59.
Spronken-Smith, R.A., Buissink-Smith, N., Grigg, G., & Bond, C. (2009). Millennium graduates orientations to higher education. College Student Journal, 43(2), 352-365.
Spronken-Smith, R., & Walker, R. (2010). Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education, 35, 723-740.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57-70.
Vermunt, J.D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31(1), 1-21.
Vermunt, J.D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171.
Vermunt, J.D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns of student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 359-384.
