How the Health Advocate Role is reflected in health professions education literature: a scoping review protocol

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.82101

Abstract

The Health Advocate Role remains challenging to teach, assess, and study. Mapping the health professions education (HPE) literature—while considering the influence of context—can offer a more nuanced understanding of how the role is conceptualized and enacted across the HPE landscape. This scoping review aims to support the contextualized implementation of the Health Advocate Role.

References

1. Frank J, Snell L, Sherbino J, editors. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.

2. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS-FM 2017: a competency framework for family physicians across the continuum. Mississauga (ON): College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2017. Available from: https://www.cfpc.ca/CFPC/media/Resources/Medical-Education/CanMEDS-Family-Medicine-2017-ENG.pdf. [Accessed on April 2, 2025]

3. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. History of CanMEDS. Available from: https://www.royalcollege.ca/en/canmeds/about-canmeds/history-canmeds.html. [Accessed on Dec 6, 2023].

4. Luft LM. The essential role of physician as advocate: how and why we pass it on. Can Med Educ J. 2017;8(3):e109–16. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.36925

5. Bhate TD, Loh LC. Building a generation of physician advocates: the case for including mandatory training in advocacy in Canadian medical school curricula. Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1602–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000841

6. Hubinette M, Dobson S, Scott I, Sherbino J. Health advocacy. Med Teach. 2017;39(2):128–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245853

7. McDonald M, Lavelle C, Wen M, Sherbino J, Hulme J. The state of health advocacy training in postgraduate medical education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2019;53(12):1209–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13929

8. Agrawal N, Lucier J, Ogawa R, Arons A. Advocacy curricula in graduate medical education: an updated systematic review from 2017 to 2022. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38(12):2792–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08244-x

9. Howell BA, Kristal RB, Whitmire LR, et al. A systematic review of advocacy curricula in graduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(11):2592–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05184-3

10. Scott MD, McQueen S, Richardson L. Teaching health advocacy: a systematic review of educational interventions for postgraduate medical trainees. Acad Med. 2020;95(4):644–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003063

11. Dhatt A, Fazelipour M, Sun T, Nemir A, Wilbur K. Health advocacy: a gulf between instruction and practice. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2024;16(5):335–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2024.01.001

12. Smith T, Harris J, Woznitza N, Maresse S, Sale C. Conceptualisation of the characteristics of advanced practitioners in the medical radiation professions. J Med Radiat Sci. 2015;62(3):204–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.115

13. van Staden D, Duma S. The teaching, learning and assessment of health advocacy in a South African college of health sciences. S Afr J High Educ. 2022;36(5):276–90. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-5-4127

14. Breton J, Francescutti LH, Al-Weshahi Y. Teaching the role of health advocate: reflections on two cross-cultural collaborative advocacy workshops for medical trainees and instructors in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018;18(3):e286–90. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2018.18.03.004

15. Ringsted C, Hansen TL, Davis D, Scherpbier A. Are some of the challenging aspects of the CanMEDS roles valid outside Canada? Med Educ. 2006;40(8):807–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02525.x

16. Li P, Jiang F, Yin L, et al. Perceptions of the CanMEDS competencies of faculty and students in different curriculum systems of a medical school in China. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;13:1061–70. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S367129

17. Endres K, Burm S, Weiman D, et al. Navigating the uncertainty of health advocacy teaching and evaluation from the trainee’s perspective. Med Teach. 2022;44(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1967905

18. LoGiudice AB, Sibbald M, Monteiro S, et al. Intrinsic or invisible? An audit of CanMEDS roles in entrustable professional activities. Acad Med. 2022;97(8):1213–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004731

19. Hubinette MM, Ajjawi R, Dharamsi S. Family physician preceptors’ conceptualizations of health advocacy: implications for medical education. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1502. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000479

20. Hubinette MM, Scott I, van der Goes T, Kahlke R. Learner conceptions of health advocacy: “going above & beyond” or “kind of an expectation.” Med Educ. 2021;55(8):933–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14526

21. Maloney DPD, Moodie R, Daube M, Wilson AN. Are Australian junior doctors failing to act as health advocates? A qualitative analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022;46(4):527–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13266

22. LaDonna KA, Kahlke R, Scott I, van der Goes T, Hubinette M. Grappling with key questions about assessment of the health advocate role. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14(1):80–9. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.73878

23. LaDonna KA, Watling CJ, Cristancho SM, Burm S. Exploring patients’ and physicians’ perspectives about competent health advocacy. Med Educ. 2021;55(4):486–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14408

24. Oosthoek WRW, Cecilio-Fernandes D, Engel MFM, et al. Bringing together conceptualisations of the health advocacy competence across the continuum of medical education: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2025;15(7):e097894. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097894

25. Scott I, Hubinette M, van der Goes T, Kahlke R. Through a tainted lens: a qualitative study of medical learners’ thinking about patient “deservingness” of health advocacy. Perspect Med Educ. 2024;13(1):151–9. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1314

26. Kahlke R, Scott I, van der Goes T, Hubinette MM. Health advocacy among medical learners: unpacking contextual barriers and affordances. Med Educ. 2023;57(7):658–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15001

27. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

28. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

29. Peter JG, Zijenah LS, Chanda D, et al. Effect on mortality of point-of-care, urine-based lipoarabinomannan testing to guide tuberculosis treatment initiation in HIV-positive hospital inpatients: a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicountry, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10024):1187–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01092-2

30. Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 2017;92(2):161–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452

31. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2004.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-27

Issue

Section

Works-in-Progress