The Role of the Disciplines in Cardinal Newman's Theory of a Liberal Education

Authors

  • Daniel G. Mulcahy Assistant Professor of Education, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11575/jet.v6i1.43586

Abstract

For over a century Cardinal Newman's contribution to the idea of a liberal education has received widespread attention. His basic position, that a liberal education conslsts in a well-informed judgment combined with an ability to perform the different logical operations involved in reasoning well, has frequently been criticized on the grounds that it failed to cater to religious and moral training. However, this is not an altogether legitimate criticism. Newman never intended his liberal education to be the only education the university student would receive. It was to form just a part, albeit an extremely important part, of a university undergraduate education-1 Nevertheless, while a substantial portion of the literature on Newman's educational thought is devoted to discussion of this issue, when in fact no real problem exists here, other and more genuine difficulties have been overlooked. Accordingly, it is not my intention to further the already protracted debate concerning the appropriateness of a liberal education as understood by Newman at the university level. It is on one of the real problem areas, specifically on Newman's idea of the possibility of scientific knowledge and its implications for the curriculum of a liberal education, that I wish to focus attention.

Author Biography

Daniel G. Mulcahy, Assistant Professor of Education, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick

Assistant Professor of Education, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick

Published

2018-05-10

Issue

Section

Articles