Children, Bonsai Trees and Open Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11575/jet.v10i1.43839Abstract
I claim that the central model of theories of Open Education
involves at least four normative and epistemological theses:
(1) the thesis of normative developmentalism;
(2) the thesis of affective primitivism;
(3) the thesis of motivational simplicity;
( 4) the Cartesian thesis of privileged, incorrigible access to
conscious events.
I first examine the theses. I then articulate various philosophical
reservations which I have about them. Although I
reject the model, I do not reject one of the ultimate goals of
Open Education, viz., the formation of communities of growing,
loving, open, and self-directed persons.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Journal of Educational Thought retains first publication rights for all articles. The Journal grants reproduction rights for noncommercial educational purposes with the provision that full acknowledgement of the work’s source be noted on each copy. The Journal will redirect to the appropriate authors any inquiries for further commercial publication of individual articles. All authors wishing to publish in JET will be asked to fill in and sign a Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright agreement.
Authors must affirm that any submission to JET has not been and will not be published or submitted elsewhere while under considration by JET.