Epistemic Authority, Institutional Power, and Curricular Knowledge
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11575/jet.v16i1.43918Résumé
Under what conditions are student rejections of teacher authority legitimate? This paper used Keddie 's (1971) discussion of classroom know ledge as a critique of Peters' (1966) widely accepted analysis and justification of teacher authority. The contention is that Peters ' justification relies upon contrafactual presuppositions about what the teacher knows and what the teacher teaches. As such, it functions to legitimate a perspective of teacher authority which is misleading as a reflection of classroom practice. The author argues that what would in theory be considered (philosophically justified) authority based on superior disciplinary knowledge is in fact an extension of (sociologically explained) institutional power. This has important implications for the view that an aim of education is the promotion of autonomous rationality.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
The Journal of Educational Thought retains first publication rights for all articles. The Journal grants reproduction rights for noncommercial educational purposes with the provision that full acknowledgement of the work’s source be noted on each copy. The Journal will redirect to the appropriate authors any inquiries for further commercial publication of individual articles. All authors wishing to publish in JET will be asked to fill in and sign a Consent to Publish and Transfer of Copyright agreement.
Authors must affirm that any submission to JET has not been and will not be published or submitted elsewhere while under considration by JET.
