Exploring the perspectives of new-in-practice specialists about the Health Advocate role: “I didn’t even know where to start”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78570Abstract
Introduction: Current approaches to health advocate (HA) training leave many physicians feeling ill-equipped to advocate effectively. Likewise, faculty perceive the HA role as challenging to teach, role model, evaluate and assess. Progress on improving HA training is further stalled by debate over the role’s importance and whether it should be considered intrinsic to medical practice. Recent graduates are well-positioned to comment on how these challenges affect HA training and preparation for practice. Therefore, our purpose was to explore the perspectives of new-in-practice physicians who are keen to be effective advocates.
Methods: Ten early-career physicians participated in semi-structured interviews exploring their perceived competence and motivation to engage in health advocacy. Constructivist grounded theory informed the iterative data collection and analysis process.
Results: Participants wished they knew during training how much they would use advocacy in practice. While training imparted adequate patient-level advocacy skills, participants felt underprepared to enact system-level advocacy–which they conceptualized as a wide-range of activities including political advocacy. In turn, participants grappled with lack of preparation, waning motivation, feelings of futility, lack of value for advocacy and need for self-preservation. For these reasons, they questioned whether system-level advocacy should be expected of all physicians.
Conclusions: Although training may adequately prepare physicians for patient-level advocacy, system-level advocacy training remains insufficient. While patient-level advocacy is integral to good care, whether system-level advocacy should be a universal expectation deserves closer consideration. Perhaps system-level health advocacy may be better conceptualized as a specialized role requiring additional training. Regardless, physician advocates’ efforts need to be valued for their contributions.
References
1. Fried JE, Shipman SA, Sessums LL. Advocacy: achieving physician competency. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(11):2297-2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05278-y
2. Earnest MA, Wong SL, Federico SG. Perspective: phyysician advocacy: What is it and how do we do it? Acad Med. 2010;85(1):63-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c40d40
3. Douglas A, Mak D, Bulsara C, Macey D, Samarawickrema I. The teaching and learning of health advocacy in an Australian medical school. Int J Med Educ. 2018;9:26-34. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5a4b.6a15
4. American Medical Association. AMA declaration of professional responsibility. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/ama-declaration-professional-responsibility. [Accessed May 17, 2023].
5. Sood M, Blane DN, Williamson AE. “A drive to make change” - exploring the views and experiences of medical students engaging in advocacy: a qualitative study in a UK medical school. Educ Prim Care. 2023;34(1):44-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2022.2161071
6. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS Role Health Advocate. Available at https://www.royalcollege.ca/ca/en/canmeds/canmeds-framework/canmeds-role-health-advocate.html [Accessed May 17, 2023].
7. Hubinette MM, LaDonna KA, Scott I, van der Goes T, Kahlke R. When I say… health advocacy. Med Educ. 2022;56(4):362-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14728
8. Vance MC, Kennedy KG. Developing an advocacy curriculum: lessons learned from a national survey of psychiatric residency programs. Acad Psychiatry. 2020;44(3):283-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-020-01179-z
9. McDonald M, Lavelle C, Wen M, Sherbino J, Hulme J. The state of health advocacy training in postgraduate medical education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2019;53(12):1209-1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13929
10. Dobson S, Voyer S, Hubinette M, Regehr G. From the clinic to the community: the activities and abilities of effective health advocates. Acad Med. 2015;90(2):214-220. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000588
11. Renting N, Raat ANJ, Dornan T, et al. Integrated and implicit: how residents learn CanMEDS roles by participating in practice. Med Educ. 2017;51(9):942-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13335
12. Bhate TD, Loh LC. Building a Generation of Physician Advocates: The Case for Including Mandatory Training in Advocacy in Canadian Medical School Curricula. Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1602-1606. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000841
13. Flynn L, Verma S. Fundamental components of a curriculum for residents in health advocacy. Med Teach. 2008;30(7):e178-e183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802139757
14. Dharamsi S, Richards M, Louie D, et al. Enhancing medical students’ conceptions of the CanMEDS Health Advocate Role through international service-learning and critical reflection: A phenomenological study. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):977-982. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903394579
15. Chou S, Cole G, McLaughlin K, Lockyer J. CanMEDS evaluation in Canadian postgraduate training programmes: tools used and programme director satisfaction. Med Educ. 2008;42(9):879-886. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03111.x
16. Hubinette M, Dobson S, Voyer S, Regehr G. “We” not “I”: health advocacy is a team sport. Med Educ. 2014;48(9):895-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12523
17. Griewatz J, Yousef A, Rothdiener M, Lammerding-Koeppel M. Are we preparing for collaboration, advocacy and leadership? Targeted multi-site analysis of collaborative intrinsic roles implementation in medical undergraduate curricula. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1940-0
18. Poulton A, Rose H. The importance of health advocacy in Canadian postgraduate medical education: current attitudes and issues. Can Med Educ J. 2015;6(2):e54-60. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.32246
19. Hadedeya D, Ageely G, Alsaleh N, et al. Residents’ perspectives: Does the Saudi general surgery residency training program apply CanMEDS competencies and prepare future leaders? Can Med Educ J. 2020;11(6):e24-e30. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.68488
20. Hancher-Rauch HL, Gebru Y, Carson A. Health advocacy for busy professionals: effective advocacy with little time. Health Promot Pract. 2019;20(4):489-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919830927
21. Dijkstra IS, Pols J, Remmelts P, Brand PLP. Preparedness for practice: a systematic cross-specialty evaluation of the alignment between postgraduate medical education and independent practice. Med Teach. 2015;37(2):153-161. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.929646
22. Morrow G, Burford B, Redfern N, Briel R, Illing J. Does specialty training prepare doctors for senior roles? A questionnaire study of new UK consultants. Postgrad Med J. 2012;88(1044):558-565. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130460
23. Binnendyk J, Pack R, Field E, Watling C. Not wanted on the voyage: highlighting intrinsic CanMEDS gaps in Competence by Design curricula. Can Med Educ J. 2021;12(4):39-47. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.70950
24. LaDonna KA, Kahlke R, Scott I, Van der Goes T, Hubinette M. Grappling with key questions about assessment of the Health Advocate role. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14(1):80-89. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.73878
25. Hubinette MM, Ajjawi R, Dharamsi S. Family physician preceptors’ conceptualizations of health advocacy: implications for medical education. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1502-1509. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000479
26. Howell BA, Kristal RB, Whitmire LR, Gentry M, Rabin TL, Rosenbaum J. A systematic review of advocacy curricula in graduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(11):2592-2601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05184-3
27. Endres K, Burm S, Weiman D, et al. Navigating the uncertainty of health advocacy teaching and evaluation from the trainee’s perspective. Med Teach. 2022;44(1):79-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2021.1967905
28. Hubinette MM, Scott I, van der Goes T, Kahlke R. Learner conceptions of health advocacy: ‘Going above & beyond’ or ‘kind of an expectation.’ Med Educ. 2021;55(8):933-941. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14526
29. LaDonna KA, Field E, Watling C, Lingard L, Haddara W, Cristancho SM. Navigating complexity in team‐based clinical settings. Med Educ. 2018;52(11):1125-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13671.
30. Dobson S, Voyer S, Regehr G. Perspective: agency and activism: rethinking health advocacy in the medical profession. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1161-1164. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182621c25
31. Huddle TS. Perspective: Medical professionalism and medical education should not involve commitments to political advocacy. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):378-383. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086efe
32. Snadden D. Teaching advocacy--balancing the individual and society? Med Teach. 2013;35(5):341-342. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.775418
33. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS 2025. Available from https://www.royalcollege.ca/ca/en/canmeds/canmeds-25.html [Accessed June 2, 2023].
34. Stafford S, Sedlak T, Fok MC, Wong RY. Evaluation of resident attitudes and self-reported competencies in health advocacy. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-82
35. Busing N, Rosenfield J, Rungta K, et al. Smoothing the transition points in Canadian medical education. Acad Med. 2018;93(5):715-721. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002072
36. Bandiera G. Emergency medicine health advocacy: foundations for training and practice. CJEM. 2003;5(5):336-342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1481803500015852
37. Guerrero Z, Iruretagoyena B, Parry S, Henderson C. Anti-stigma advocacy for health professionals: a systematic review. J Ment Health. 2024;33(3):394-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2023.2182421
38. Howell BA, Kristal RB, Whitmire LR, Gentry M, Rabin TL, Rosenbaum J. A systematic review of advocacy curricula in graduate medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(11):2592-2601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05184-3.39.
39. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications; 2006.
40. Charmaz K. Constructionism and grounded theory. In: Holstein JA, Gubrium JF, eds. Handbook of constructionist research. The Guilford Press; 2008:397-416. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607927.n14
41. Reid AM, Brown JM, Smith JM, Cope AC, Jamieson S. Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(2):69-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2
42. Thoma B, Karwowska A, Samson L, et al. Emerging concepts in the CanMEDS physician competency framework. Can Med Educ J. 2022;14(1):4-12. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75591
43. Gallagher S, Little M. Doctors on values and advocacy: a qualitative and evaluative study. Health Care Anal. 2017;25(4):370-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-016-0322-6
44. Law M, Leung P, Veinot P, Miller D, Mylopoulos M. A qualitative study of the experiences and factors that led physicians to be lifelong health advocates. Acad Med. 2016; 91(10):1392-1397. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001316
45. Kahlke R, Scott I, van Der Goes T, Hubinette MM. Health advocacy among medical learners: Unpacking contextual barriers and affordances. Med Educ. 2023;57(7):658-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15001.
46. Pourbairamian G, Bigdeli S, Soltani Arabshahi SK, et al. Hidden curriculum in medical residency programs: a scoping review. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022;10(2):69-82. https://doi.org/10.30476/JAMP.2021.92478.1486.
47. Fazey D, Fazey J. Perspectives on motivation: the implications for effective learning in higher education. In: Brown S, Armstrong S, Thompson G, eds. Motivating students. The staff and educational development series. Routledge; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042015
48. Elliot AJ, Dweck CS. Handbook of competence and motivation. Guilford Press; 2005.
49. Horn TS. Competence motivation theory. In: Eklund RC, Tenenbaum G, eds. Encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2014. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483332222.n70
50. Nerlinger AL, Shah AN, Beck AF, et al. The advocacy portfolio: a standardized tool for documenting physician advocacy. Acad Med. 2018;93(6):860-868. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002122
51. Frank J, Snell LS, Sherbino, J, eds. The CanMEDS 2015 milestone guide. Selected milestones. Available at https://canmeds.royalcollege.ca/guide/exportpdf/guide.pdf?role=COM&stage=&hot-topic=&show-milestones=on
52. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS Role: scholar. Available at https://www.royalcollege.ca/ca/en/canmeds/canmeds-framework/canmeds-role-scholar.html [Accessed May 26, 2023].
53. LaDonna KA, Artino AR, Balmer DF. Beyond the guise of saturation: rigor and qualitative interview data. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(5):607-611. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-21-00752.1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jacqueline Dorothy Cochrane , Nancy Dudek, Kelsey Crawford, Lindsay Cowley , Kori A LaDonna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
